Teams

MLF YELLOW

2023 CTA WOMEN'S DAYTIME DOUBLES - NOCO · WOMEN 3.5 - DAYTIME - NOCO

8 players · average NTRP 3.25 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2023-06-20vs HMTC GREENLost 12
L#1 DoublesCarol Hiller / Debora J Miller vs Karen Johnson / Margaret Gates1-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesAnne Nemeth / Tracy Hutton vs Jill Braddock / Julie Ignowski6-3, 6-7, 1-0
L#3 DoublesAdelle Byra / Nancy Pajak vs Judy Stout / Rona van Sickle5-7, 7-6, 0-1
2023-06-13vs FCCC PURPLELost 02
L#1 DoublesMarsha Conley / Leticia Dunn vs Julia Tynan / Aileen VanMeveren2-6, 6-4, 0-1
L#3 DoublesNancy Pajak / Adelle Byra vs June Ellen Feil / Jane Gronewoller3-6, 1-6
2023-06-06vs CSU GOLDLost 01
L#3 DoublesCarol Hiller / Tracy Hutton vs Erin Dirvonas / Janet Gugliotto6-4, 2-6, 0-1
2023-05-30vs FCCC REDSplit 11
L#2 DoublesAnne Nemeth / Carol Hiller vs Kelli Barber / Melissa Conlon2-6, 1-6
W#3 DoublesLeticia Dunn / Tracy Hutton vs Holly K. Brown / Kim McConnellogue6-4, 6-4
2023-05-23vs LVTA ORANGELost 02
L#2 DoublesNancy Pajak / Mary Wedum vs Nancy Pflughoeft / Debbie Hansen6-7, 6-7
L#3 DoublesCarol Hiller / Leticia Dunn vs Lesa Morrill-Hughes / Austin Johnson0-6, 4-6
2023-05-16vs TAG BLUEWon 20
W#2 DoublesLeticia Dunn / Tracy Hutton vs Michelle Sheets / Denise Andrews7-6, 6-1
W#3 DoublesCarol Hiller / Nancy Pajak vs N/A6-0, 6-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for WOMEN 3.5 - DAYTIME - NOCO have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.07 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.37
Tracy Hutton
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.25
Debora J Miller
published 3.5
3.08
Leticia Dunn
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
2.89
Nancy Pajak
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3
Adelle Byra
published 3
2.74
Carol Hiller
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 3
Marsha Conley
published
Mary Wedum
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Leticia Dunn + Tracy Hutton6354% games−4.1% vs expected
Nancy Pajak + Carol Hiller5262% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Tracy Hutton
71W–37L career · 4 lines in 2023
<1%82%17%
3.37
3.5
Debora J Miller
9W–7L career · no lines in 2023
4%93%4%
3.25
3.5
Leticia Dunn
38W–55L career · 4 lines in 2023
28%72%<1%
3.08
3
Nancy Pajak
56W–74L career · 4 lines in 2023
<1%78%22%
2.89
3
Adelle Byra
10W–9L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
3
Carol Hiller
74W–70L career · 5 lines in 2023
5%92%3%
2.74
Marsha Conley
1W–1L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Mary Wedum
2W–6L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.