Teams

HMTC GREEN

2023 CTA WOMEN'S DAYTIME DOUBLES - NOCO · WOMEN 3.5 - DAYTIME - NOCO

7 players · average NTRP 3.25 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2023-06-20vs MLF YELLOWWon 10
W#3 DoublesJudy Stout / Rona van Sickle vs Adelle Byra / Nancy Pajak7-5, 6-7, 1-0
2023-06-13vs LVTA ORANGELost 01
L#1 DoublesTeresa Adsit / Margaret Gates vs Vicky Hadley / Dawn Hagen7-6, 6-7, 0-1
2023-06-06vs TAG BLUELost 02
L#2 DoublesRona van Sickle / Jill Braddock vs Larea Warden / Janet Crespin2-6, 6-2, 0-1
L#3 DoublesKaren Johnson / Teresa Adsit vs Angela Ehrlich / Sharon Sturges2-6, 3-6
2023-05-23vs CSU GOLDWon 10
W#3 DoublesRona van Sickle / Judy Stout vs Camille Benton / Nicola Allen6-1, 6-0
2023-05-16vs FCCC REDLost 02
L#1 DoublesTeresa Adsit / Wendy Ball vs Kelli Barber / Kelsey Nosler1-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesKristen Frisch / Judy Stout vs Holly K. Brown / Melissa Conlon1-6, 2-6
2023-05-09vs FCCC PURPLELost 02
L#1 DoublesTeresa Adsit / Kristen Frisch vs June Ellen Feil / Sandra Lautzenheiser1-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesMargaret Gates / Judy Stout vs Lisa Clay / Kristine Clagett6-3, 3-6, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for WOMEN 3.5 - DAYTIME - NOCO have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.85 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.20
Kristen Frisch
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.00
Teresa Adsit
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.98
Rona van Sickle
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
2.69
Wendy Ball
published
2.40
Judy Stout
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3
Julie Ignowski
published
Kathi Freemann
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Rona van Sickle + Judy Stout3446% gamesnot enough data
Teresa Adsit + Judy Stout1532% gamesnot enough data
Judy Stout + Kristen Frisch033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Kristen Frisch
74W–53L career · 2 lines in 2023
7%91%2%
3.20
3
Teresa Adsit
81W–107L career · 4 lines in 2023
<1%49%51%
3.00
3.5
Rona van Sickle
15W–40L career · type A · 3 lines in 2023
55%45%<1%
2.98
Wendy Ball
3W–8L career · no lines in 2023
9%90%1%
2.69
3
Judy Stout
35W–126L career · 4 lines in 2023
77%23%<1%
2.40
Julie Ignowski
0W–4L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Kathi Freemann
2W–3L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.