Teams

CPV ORANGE

2022 USTA ADULT 40 & OVER - DEN · WOMEN 3.5 - 40 & OVER

11 players · average NTRP 3.25 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2022-07-21vs SSLT NAVYWon 21
W#1 DoublesJami Keenan / Liz Bauer vs Ellen Thompson / Brenda Lillard7-6, 6-3
W#2 DoublesJill Fox / Elizabeth Jenks vs Andrea Bailey / CELESTE SIADE6-3
L#3 DoublesChristy Notary / Alison Barbaro vs Carin Buster / Karen McIntire6-4, 3-6, 0-1
2022-07-21vs PRC REDLost 12
W#1 DoublesJill Fox / Elizabeth Jenks vs Leslie Hathaway / Lisa Rosen6-7, 6-1, 1-0
L#2 DoublesElizabeth Zeller / Stacia Novak vs Bridget Moreno / Carrie del Toro4-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesAlison Barbaro / Eva Field vs Linda Manassee Buell / Julie Hernandez3-6, 4-6
2022-07-14vs CACI REDWon 31
W#1 DoublesMary Lostak / Liz Bauer vs Barbara Hall / Diane Lopez6-2, 4-6, 1-0
W#1 SinglesStacia Novak vs Soon Hee Kolrud7-6, 6-4
W#2 DoublesJami Keenan / Elizabeth Jenks vs Melinda Conover / Karen Eagleton6-7, 7-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesEva Field / Christy Notary vs Kathryn Meyer / Diane Wells5-7, 6-2, 0-1
2022-07-07vs PCC GREENLost 13
L#1 DoublesJill Fox / Mary Lostak vs Joyce Mendes / Carolyn Overmyer1-6, 6-2, 0-1
W#1 SinglesJillian Williams vs Jacqueline Hampton6-1, 6-3
L#2 DoublesJulie Schouest / Elizabeth Jenks vs Cait Dutcher / Julie Zaveral7-5, 4-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesEva Field / Alison Barbaro vs Kristi Schumacher / Nancy Sharpe6-7, 6-7
2022-06-23vs CR GREENWon 31
W#1 DoublesJami Keenan / Stacia Novak vs Heather Marks / Carol McBroom6-2, 6-1
L#1 SinglesElizabeth Zeller vs Sara Southards4-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesMary Lostak / Jill Fox vs Kandice Dougherty / Oxana Volodko7-5, 7-5
W#3 DoublesAlison Barbaro / Eva Field vs Amy Allmon / Julie Fujita6-3, 6-1
2022-06-16vs PRC REDLost 13
W#1 DoublesMary Lostak / Jill Fox vs Julie Hernandez / Laura Jones3-6, 6-2, 1-0
L#1 SinglesElizabeth Zeller vs Kelly Glenn3-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesElizabeth Jenks / Eva Field vs Linda Manassee Buell / Wendy Mathewson4-6, 5-7
L#3 DoublesStacia Novak / Christy Notary vs Leslie Hathaway / Lisa Rosen1-6, 7-6, 0-1
2022-06-09vs CACI REDWon 31
L#1 DoublesStacia Novak / Elizabeth Zeller vs Melinda Conover / Kristen Arsenault5-7, 0-6
W#1 SinglesJami Keenan vs Soon Hee Kolrud6-4, 7-6
W#2 DoublesMary Lostak / Liz Bauer vs Karen Eagleton / Robin Becky6-4, 4-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesElizabeth Jenks / Alison Barbaro vs Kathryn Meyer / Barbara Hall6-4, 7-5
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for WOMEN 3.5 - 40 & OVER have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.14 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.58
Jami Keenan
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 25% · published 3.5
3.43
Liz Bauer
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.33
Jillian Williams
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
Elizabeth Jenks
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 17% · published 3.5
3.14
Mary Lostak
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
Eva Field
usually #3 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 3
2.72
Christy Notary
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.66
Elizabeth Zeller
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3
Alison Barbaro
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Julie Schouest
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Stacia Novak
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #1 Singles 20% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Stacia Novak + Jillian Williams4271% games+18.1% vs expected
Jami Keenan + Liz Bauer6072% games+11.3% vs expected
Elizabeth Zeller + Jami Keenan5257% games+6.1% vs expected
Stacia Novak + Elizabeth Jenks4354% games+4.8% vs expected
Liz Bauer + Mary Lostak6358% games+2.8% vs expected
Stacia Novak + Elizabeth Zeller4751% games+1.8% vs expected
Elizabeth Jenks + Julie Schouest134 matchesnot enough data
Elizabeth Jenks + Jillian Williams314 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Jami Keenan
88W–26L career · type A · 4 lines in 2022
<1%28%72%
3.58
Liz Bauer
63W–23L career · 3 lines in 2022
<1%69%31%
3.43
Jillian Williams
26W–8L career · 1 line in 2022
1%90%10%
3.33
3.5
Elizabeth Jenks
22W–31L career · 6 lines in 2022
not enough data
3.5
Mary Lostak
35W–53L career · 5 lines in 2022
14%86%<1%
3.14
3
Eva Field
13W–17L career · 5 lines in 2022
not enough data
3
Christy Notary
17W–47L career · 3 lines in 2022
5%94%2%
2.72
3
Elizabeth Zeller
31W–46L career · 4 lines in 2022
12%88%<1%
2.66
Alison Barbaro
7W–22L career · 5 lines in 2022
not enough data
Julie Schouest
8W–12L career · 1 line in 2022
not enough data
Stacia Novak
29W–26L career · 5 lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.