Teams

PRC RED

2022 USTA ADULT 40 & OVER - DEN · WOMEN 3.5 - 40 & OVER

10 players · average NTRP 3.17 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2022-07-21vs CPV ORANGEWon 21
L#1 DoublesLeslie Hathaway / Lisa Rosen vs Jill Fox / Elizabeth Jenks7-6, 1-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesBridget Moreno / Carrie del Toro vs Elizabeth Zeller / Stacia Novak6-4, 6-4
W#3 DoublesLinda Manassee Buell / Julie Hernandez vs Alison Barbaro / Eva Field6-3, 6-4
2022-07-19vs CR GREENWon 30
W#1 DoublesKelly Glenn / Wendy Mathewson vs Sara Southards / Oxana Volodko6-1, 6-2
W#1 SinglesMagdalena Chamberlain vs Heather Marks6-2, 6-2
W#3 DoublesCarrie del Toro / Franny Schmidt vs Kathy Haberman / Amy Allmon6-4, 7-6
2022-07-14vs SSLT NAVYWon 40
W#1 DoublesLaura Jones / Julie Hernandez vs Brenda Lillard / Jennifer Cree4-6, 6-2, 1-0
W#1 SinglesMagdalena Chamberlain vs Samantha Kirschke6-4, 6-1
W#2 DoublesCarrie del Toro / Bridget Moreno vs Kimberly Kurban / Michelle Rubin6-4, 6-3
W#3 DoublesLisa Rosen / Wendy Mathewson vs Kristi Mathieson / Karen McIntire4-6, 6-4, 1-0
2022-07-07vs PCC GREENWon 31
W#1 DoublesJulie Hernandez / Laura Jones vs Ann Siebert / Tina Newlin6-4, 6-2
W#1 SinglesKelly Glenn vs Stacey Griffin7-6, 7-6
W#2 DoublesCarrie del Toro / Franny Schmidt vs Cait Dutcher / Julie Zaveral7-6, 2-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesLinda Manassee Buell / Wendy Mathewson vs Nancy Sharpe / Yvonne Knapp4-6, 5-7
2022-06-23vs CACI REDWon 21
W#1 DoublesJulie Hernandez / Laura Jones vs Melinda Conover / Kristen Arsenault6-4, 6-3
L#2 DoublesCarrie del Toro / Henriette Nash vs Diane Wells / Karen Eagleton3-6, 0-6
W#3 DoublesLinda Manassee Buell / Wendy Mathewson vs Kathryn Meyer / Karen Wendling6-3, 6-4
2022-06-16vs CPV ORANGEWon 31
L#1 DoublesJulie Hernandez / Laura Jones vs Mary Lostak / Jill Fox6-3, 2-6, 0-1
W#1 SinglesKelly Glenn vs Elizabeth Zeller6-3, 6-2
W#2 DoublesLinda Manassee Buell / Wendy Mathewson vs Elizabeth Jenks / Eva Field6-4, 7-5
W#3 DoublesLeslie Hathaway / Lisa Rosen vs Stacia Novak / Christy Notary6-1, 6-7, 1-0
2022-06-09vs SSLT NAVYWon 31
W#1 DoublesJulie Hernandez / Laura Jones vs Kristi Mathieson / Jennifer Cree6-1, 6-2
W#1 SinglesKelly Glenn vs Ellen Thompson2-6, 6-0, 1-0
W#2 DoublesLeslie Hathaway / Henriette Nash vs Carin Buster / Kimberly Kurban6-1, 6-1
L#3 DoublesCarrie del Toro / Franny Schmidt vs Karen McIntire / Andrea Bailey6-1, 3-6, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for WOMEN 3.5 - 40 & OVER have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.12 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.51
Julie Hernandez
usually #1 Doubles 83%, also #3 Doubles 17% · published
3.40
Leslie Hathaway
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Bridget Moreno
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.25
Wendy Mathewson
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 3.5
3.17
Kelly Glenn
usually #1 Singles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
3.16
Magdalena Chamberlain
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
3.00
Carrie del Toro
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3
3.00
Henriette Nash
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.89
Linda Manassee Buell
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.74
Franny Schmidt
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Leslie Hathaway + Wendy Mathewson14657% games+9.1% vs expected
Julie Hernandez + Leslie Hathaway10360% games+4.1% vs expected
Linda Manassee Buell + Carrie del Toro3343% games+2.9% vs expected
Julie Hernandez + Wendy Mathewson12558% games+1.7% vs expected
Henriette Nash + Linda Manassee Buell61743% games+0.1% vs expected
Franny Schmidt + Carrie del Toro3248% games−0.7% vs expected
Henriette Nash + Kelly Glenn4550% games−0.9% vs expected
Henriette Nash + Franny Schmidt61141% games−1.8% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Julie Hernandez
110W–55L career · 6 lines in 2022
<1%48%52%
3.51
Leslie Hathaway
44W–49L career · 3 lines in 2022
<1%78%21%
3.40
3.5
Bridget Moreno
12W–7L career · 2 lines in 2022
not enough data
3.5
Wendy Mathewson
85W–54L career · 5 lines in 2022
3%95%3%
3.25
Kelly Glenn
49W–36L career · 4 lines in 2022
9%90%1%
3.17
Magdalena Chamberlain
10W–10L career · 2 lines in 2022
11%88%<1%
3.16
3
Carrie del Toro
65W–125L career · 6 lines in 2022
<1%50%50%
3.00
3
Henriette Nash
68W–128L career · 2 lines in 2022
<1%50%50%
3.00
3
Linda Manassee Buell
78W–122L career · 4 lines in 2022
<1%81%19%
2.89
3
Franny Schmidt
44W–73L career · 3 lines in 2022
3%94%2%
2.74

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.