Teams

Refund/Team Pending 18s Combo

2026 Piedmont Combo 18 & Over · Refund

13 players · average NTRP 3.33 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Flight standings4 teams · Refund
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Refund/Team Pending 18s Combo000000
2Refund/Team Pending 55s Combo000000
3Refund/Team Pending 40s Combo000000
4REfund/Team Pending 18s Combo000000

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.22 estimated across 13 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.81
Sara Nundkumar
published
3.81
Sarah Howell
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
3.69
Aravindh Raj Sankara Narayanan
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.67
Mimi Cartee
published
3.67
Heidi Wrisley
published 4
3.38
Seungil Park
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.99
Roy Malac
published
2.97
2.90
Ian Myers
published 3.5
2.85
Amy Dulin
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.79
Matias Crespo
published
2.73
Sean Jones
published
2.63
Hagen Molitoris
published 3
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Sean Jones + Roy Malac044 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Sara Nundkumar
22W–19L career · no lines in 2026
1%92%7%
3.81
Sarah Howell
33W–18L career · 3 lines in 2026
1%92%7%
3.81
3.5
Aravindh Raj Sankara Narayanan
90W–14L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%8%92%
3.69
Mimi Cartee
17W–17L career · no lines in 2026
9%90%1%
3.67
4
Heidi Wrisley
5W–6L career · no lines in 2026
9%90%1%
3.67
Seungil Park
9W–9L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%81%18%
3.38
Roy Malac
16W–65L career · no lines in 2026
52%48%<1%
2.99
3
Clara Gonzalez Flores
43W–27L career · no lines in 2026
<1%59%41%
2.97
3.5
Ian Myers
0W–18L career · type S · no lines in 2026
78%22%<1%
2.90
3
Amy Dulin
8W–24L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%87%12%
2.85
Matias Crespo
2W–8L career · no lines in 2026
95%5%<1%
2.79
Sean Jones
15W–30L career · no lines in 2026
4%94%2%
2.73
3
Hagen Molitoris
10W–22L career · no lines in 2026
15%84%<1%
2.63

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.