Teams

CSU

2023 TRIO - NOCO · MEN 3.5 - TRIO - NOCO

10 players · average NTRP 3.64 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2023-04-22vs LVTAWon 30
W#1 DoublesWade Bontempo / Matthew Solley vs Rob Davis / Paul Akers6-2, 5-7, 1-0
W#1 SinglesKevin Sloan vs Dave Trammell6-0, 6-0
W#2 DoublesChris Provost / Tyler Hempstead vs Dennis Tralmer / William Donkersgoed6-0, 7-5
2023-04-15vs FCCCWon 30
W#1 DoublesWade Bontempo / James DuPriest vs Rick Lowder / Don Kennedy6-0, 4-6, 1-0
W#1 SinglesJeff Arnett vs David Shigekane6-4, 6-3
W#2 DoublesDaniel Holmes / Kevin Sloan vs Derek Samuelson / Neal McConnellogue6-1, 6-2
2023-04-08vs MLFWon 21
W#1 DoublesCraig Seager / Matthew Solley vs Jasjot Johar / Dan Gessler6-0, 6-2
L#1 SinglesJeff Arnett vs Danial Lewis6-0, 3-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesRodney Campos / Tyler Hempstead vs Justin Bzdek / Patrick Murphy6-4, 7-6
2023-04-01vs HMTCWon 30
W#1 DoublesJames DuPriest / Tyler Hempstead vs Steve Weber / Nick Hansen6-1, 6-0
W#1 SinglesKevin Sloan vs Crip Erickson6-2, 6-2
W#2 DoublesChris Provost / Daniel Holmes vs Fabio Sandri / Joe Whitlock6-2, 7-5
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings4 teams · MEN 3.5 - TRIO - NOCO
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1FCCC316614114
2MLF22751196
3HMTC237818137
4CSU237819133

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.53 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.83
Tyler Hempstead
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.78
Jeff Arnett
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
3.60
Matthew Solley
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.56
Craig Seager
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.43
Daniel Holmes
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.28
Rodney Campos
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.26
Chris Provost
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
James DuPriest
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
Kevin Sloan
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Wade Bontempo
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Daniel Holmes + Chris Provost6161% games+5.3% vs expected
Daniel Holmes + Jeff Arnett303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Tyler Hempstead
68W–31L career · 3 lines in 2023
1%90%9%
3.83
Jeff Arnett
48W–8L career · 2 lines in 2023
1%94%5%
3.78
4
Matthew Solley
55W–43L career · 2 lines in 2023
23%77%<1%
3.60
3.5
Craig Seager
24W–13L career · 1 line in 2023
<1%33%67%
3.56
3.5
Daniel Holmes
57W–27L career · 2 lines in 2023
<1%70%30%
3.43
3.5
Rodney Campos
58W–33L career · 1 line in 2023
2%94%5%
3.28
3.5
Chris Provost
19W–5L career · 2 lines in 2023
2%94%3%
3.26
3.5
James DuPriest
30W–8L career · 2 lines in 2023
not enough data
Kevin Sloan
4W–1L career · 3 lines in 2023
not enough data
Wade Bontempo
16W–5L career · 2 lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.