Teams

Ka.Wahle40C

2024 Capital Combo 40 & Over · 5.5 Women

13 players · average NTRP 3.00 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2024-10-08vs Co.Philpot40CLost 01
L#1 DoublesVickie Dagit / Kathryn Williamson vs Michelle Pilos / Sarah Cooke6-4, 3-6, 1-0
2024-09-29vs Sh.Brodsgaard40CLost 02
L#2 DoublesDanielle Cardona / Karen Blume vs Jennifer Kazmierczak / Ann Flores6-3, 2-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesVickie Dagit / Maria Riemann vs Carrie Russell / Michelle Eisenberg0-6, 2-6
2024-09-10vs Da.Rusnak40CSplit 11
W#1 DoublesKaren Blume / Camila Dunston vs Amy Cagle / Ashley Lindeman6-2, 6-3
L#3 DoublesVickie Dagit / Kathryn Williamson vs Teri O'Neill / Dawn Rusnak3-6, 4-6
2024-08-20vs Sh.Brodsgaard40CLost 02
L#1 DoublesMary T Long / Karen Blume vs Jennifer Kazmierczak / Ginger Scanlon3-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesKathryn Williamson / Danielle Cardona vs Marilyn Slaymaker / Tricia Manger6-7, 2-6
2024-08-18vs Da.Rusnak40CLost 01
L#3 DoublesMary McCulley / Vickie Dagit vs Dawn Rusnak / Teri O'Neill2-6, 0-6
2024-08-13vs Am.Cantando40CSplit 11
L#1 DoublesKaren Blume / Jennifer Tun vs Karen Bornhofen / Katherine Rostick4-6, 2-6
W#3 DoublesDanielle Cardona / Maria Riemann vs Josie Tattersall / Brandy Vannoy6-2, 6-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 5.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.59 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.87
Karen Blume
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.86
Shannon Sikes
published
2.80
Jennifer Tun
published
2.78
Mary T Long
published
2.70
Danielle Cardona
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.69
Joanna Valler
published
2.52
Vickie Dagit
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.51
Kimberly Roberts
published
2.44
Lynn Longest
published
2.35
Kathryn Williamson
published
2.30
Lusally Hong
published
2.30
Mary McCulley
published
Maria Riemann
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Vickie Dagit + Karen Blume224 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Karen Blume
42W–37L career · 4 lines in 2024
<1%82%18%
2.87
Shannon Sikes
9W–10L career · no lines in 2024
<1%83%17%
2.86
Jennifer Tun
4W–9L career · no lines in 2024
1%90%8%
2.80
Mary T Long
27W–68L career · no lines in 2024
2%92%6%
2.78
3
Danielle Cardona
20W–38L career · 3 lines in 2024
8%91%2%
2.70
Joanna Valler
3W–2L career · no lines in 2024
9%90%1%
2.69
3
Vickie Dagit
28W–96L career · type A · 4 lines in 2024
45%55%<1%
2.52
Kimberly Roberts
4W–8L career · no lines in 2024
0%48%52%
2.51
Lynn Longest
2W–11L career · no lines in 2024
67%33%<1%
2.44
Kathryn Williamson
1W–5L career · no lines in 2024
85%15%<1%
2.35
Lusally Hong
3W–2L career · no lines in 2024
0%92%8%
2.30
Mary McCulley
3W–7L career · no lines in 2024
0%92%8%
2.30
Maria Riemann
2W–0L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.