Teams

Sh.Brodsgaard40C

2024 Capital Combo 40 & Over · 5.5 Women

11 players · average NTRP 3.20 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2024-10-08vs Da.Rusnak40CWon 21
L#1 DoublesShayne Brodsgaard / Diane Adams vs Heather Word / Ashley Lindeman6-2, 2-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesMarilyn Slaymaker / Carrie Russell vs Jade Paunovich / Veronica Glass7-5, 6-3
W#3 DoublesGinger Scanlon / Kate Pirrung vs Teri O'Neill / Leigh Watson6-4, 6-4
2024-10-01vs Co.Philpot40CWon 20
W#2 DoublesShayne Brodsgaard / Diane Adams vs Shannon Parham / Robin Wascher6-1, 6-0
W#3 DoublesKate Pirrung / Ann Flores vs Elisabeth Nixon / Cara Pierce6-3, 6-4
2024-09-29vs Ka.Wahle40CWon 20
W#1 DoublesTricia Manger / Kate Pirrung vs Camila Dunston / Shannon Sikes4-6, 6-4, 1-0
W#2 DoublesJennifer Kazmierczak / Ann Flores vs Danielle Cardona / Karen Blume6-3, 2-6, 1-0
2024-09-10vs Am.Cantando40CWon 21
W#1 DoublesKate Pirrung / Ann Flores vs Karen Bornhofen / Katherine Rostick4-6, 6-1, 1-0
W#2 DoublesJenna Wooten-Quade / Carrie Russell vs Ellen Nespeca / Brandy Vannoy6-0, 6-1
L#3 DoublesGinger Scanlon / Tricia Manger vs Amy Cantando / Mary Kincheloe3-6, 7-5, 0-1
2024-09-03vs Da.Rusnak40CWon 30
W#1 DoublesCarrie Russell / Summer DuMont vs Julie Shuey / Karen Rayda6-2, 6-4
W#2 DoublesKate Pirrung / Tricia Manger vs Ashley Lindeman / Rondi Furgason6-1, 6-1
W#3 DoublesJenna Wooten-Quade / Michelle Eisenberg vs Kelly Huffstetler / Sheri Roberson6-1, 6-2
2024-08-27vs Co.Philpot40CWon 30
W#1 DoublesJenna Wooten-Quade / Ginger Scanlon vs Sarah Cooke / Michelle Pilos6-4, 6-3
W#2 DoublesKate Pirrung / Tricia Manger vs Cosette Philpot / Jessica Jones6-4, 6-1
W#3 DoublesJennifer Kazmierczak / Ann Flores vs Shannon Parham / Robin Wascher6-2, 6-0
2024-08-20vs Ka.Wahle40CWon 30
W#1 DoublesJennifer Kazmierczak / Ginger Scanlon vs Mary T Long / Karen Blume6-3, 6-4
W#2 DoublesMarilyn Slaymaker / Tricia Manger vs Kathryn Williamson / Danielle Cardona7-6, 6-2
W#3 DoublesKate Pirrung / Michelle Eisenberg vs Karen Wahle / Maria Riemann6-1, 6-2
2024-08-06vs Am.Cantando40CWon 30
W#1 DoublesAshley Walton / Ginger Scanlon vs Josie Tattersall / Karen Bornhofen6-3, 6-0
W#2 DoublesMarilyn Slaymaker / Carrie Russell vs Amy Cantando / Courtney Grinnell6-2, 6-2
W#3 DoublesJenna Wooten-Quade / Diane Adams vs Ellen Nespeca / Angela McGee6-4, 7-5
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 5.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.04 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.36
Kate Pirrung
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 30% · published 3.5
3.34
Carrie Russell
published 3.5
3.27
Jennifer Kazmierczak
usually #1 Doubles 43%, also #3 Doubles 29% · published 3.5
3.24
Ashley Walton
published 3.5
3.15
Summer DuMont
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.14
Shayne Brodsgaard
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3
3.04
Marilyn Slaymaker
usually #2 Doubles 56%, also #3 Doubles 22% · published 3
2.86
Jenna Wooten-Quade
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.81
Michelle Eisenberg
published
2.80
Ginger Scanlon
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published 3
2.43
Ann Flores
published 2.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Jennifer Kazmierczak + Shayne Brodsgaard5160% games+6.0% vs expected
Jennifer Kazmierczak + Carrie Russell6451% games+2.7% vs expected
Marilyn Slaymaker + Jennifer Kazmierczak9753% games+1.6% vs expected
Marilyn Slaymaker + Summer DuMont5950% games−3.3% vs expected
Ginger Scanlon + Jenna Wooten-Quade10358% gamesnot enough data
Marilyn Slaymaker + Shayne Brodsgaard6562% gamesnot enough data
Kate Pirrung + Marilyn Slaymaker2446% gamesnot enough data
Kate Pirrung + Summer DuMont4259% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Kate Pirrung
185W–118L career · 10 lines in 2024
<1%85%14%
3.36
3.5
Carrie Russell
21W–19L career · no lines in 2024
<1%89%10%
3.34
3.5
Jennifer Kazmierczak
85W–90L career · 7 lines in 2024
2%94%4%
3.27
3.5
Ashley Walton
18W–18L career · no lines in 2024
3%95%2%
3.24
3.5
Summer DuMont
87W–72L career · 2 lines in 2024
12%88%<1%
3.15
3
Shayne Brodsgaard
130W–60L career · 4 lines in 2024
<1%15%85%
3.14
3
Marilyn Slaymaker
158W–104L career · 9 lines in 2024
<1%37%63%
3.04
3
Jenna Wooten-Quade
41W–14L career · 4 lines in 2024
<1%85%14%
2.86
Michelle Eisenberg
8W–8L career · no lines in 2024
1%92%8%
2.81
3
Ginger Scanlon
66W–52L career · 5 lines in 2024
1%93%6%
2.80
2.5
Ann Flores
14W–9L career · no lines in 2024
0%69%31%
2.43

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.