Teams

Goy - Tri18s W 4.0/3.5/3.0 Tues

2024 Piedmont Tri-Level 18 & Over · 4.0

15 players · average NTRP 3.75 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
W#3 DoublesKatie Bir / Blythe Murphy vs Debbie Shane / Jill Phelps6-4, 6-2
2024-07-02vs Dulin - Tri18s W 4.0/3.5/3.0 TuesWon 10
W#3 DoublesThais Warwar / Blythe Murphy vs Jamie Cunningham / Aimee Largen6-2, 6-1
W#3 DoublesBlythe Murphy / Katie Bir vs Kelly Guyler / Teri Bramsway6-2, 1-6, 1-0
2024-06-04Won 10
W#3 DoublesBlythe Murphy / Thais Warwar vs Amy Hanson / Lynn Crawford6-3, 6-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 4.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.49 estimated across 14 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.95
Sally Eagleton
published
3.91
Kristin Williamson
published
3.83
Cari Powell
published 4
3.72
Kara Ray
published
3.53
Kimberly Franz
published
3.50
Gina Goy
published
3.41
Judiann Georgevich
published
3.37
Deirdre Hjelt
published 3.5
3.37
Blythe Murphy
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.31
Thais Warwar
published
3.29
Jen Berlin
published
3.25
Lora Farlow
published
3.00
Katie Bir
published
Sarah Stafford
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Chetana Honnarayanahalli + Gina Goy41142% games+3.9% vs expected
Chetana Honnarayanahalli + Judiann Georgevich5159% games+2.2% vs expected
Chetana Honnarayanahalli + Kristin Williamson5257% gamesnot enough data
Blythe Murphy + Thais Warwar314 matchesnot enough data
Kara Ray + Cari Powell314 matchesnot enough data
Cari Powell + Judiann Georgevich314 matchesnot enough data
Gina Goy + Judiann Georgevich314 matchesnot enough data
Deirdre Hjelt + Jen Berlin224 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Sally Eagleton
20W–10L career · no lines in 2024
63%37%<1%
3.95
Kristin Williamson
40W–35L career · no lines in 2024
<1%73%27%
3.91
4
Cari Powell
34W–14L career · no lines in 2024
1%88%11%
3.83
Kara Ray
17W–9L career · no lines in 2024
6%92%2%
3.72
Kimberly Franz
41W–25L career · no lines in 2024
<1%43%57%
3.53
Gina Goy
33W–35L career · no lines in 2024
51%49%<1%
3.50
4
Chetana Honnarayanahalli
30W–30L career · type A · no lines in 2024
71%29%<1%
3.42
Judiann Georgevich
35W–16L career · no lines in 2024
<1%74%25%
3.41
3.5
Deirdre Hjelt
54W–22L career · no lines in 2024
<1%81%18%
3.37
3.5
Blythe Murphy
127W–108L career · 4 lines in 2024
<1%83%17%
3.37
Thais Warwar
29W–22L career · no lines in 2024
1%90%8%
3.31
Jen Berlin
22W–25L career · no lines in 2024
2%92%6%
3.29
Lora Farlow
6W–3L career · no lines in 2024
4%93%4%
3.25
Katie Bir
27W–23L career · no lines in 2024
<1%50%50%
3.00
Sarah Stafford
2W–2L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.