Teams

Mitchell/PG/FAC

2024 Adult Singles 18 & Over · 2.5 Women

5 players · average NTRP 3.00 / ARKANSAS

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2025-01-25vs Gagliardo/Rogers/SVCCWon 10
W#3 SinglesKathryn Panek vs Lindsey Fraser6-4, 3-6, 1-0
2024-12-10vs Sander/Fayetteville/SRCLost 02
L#2 SinglesRachel Cockrell vs Lacey Baker0-6, 2-6
L#3 SinglesTania Brewer vs Annie Frail4-6, 3-6
2024-12-08vs Erickson/Springdale/INDSplit 11
W#1 SinglesBrittani Hradsky vs Samantha Thiede Erickson6-4, 2-6, 1-0
L#2 SinglesKathryn Panek vs Andi Douglas6-2, 1-6, 1-0
2024-11-10vs Gagliardo/Rogers/SVCCLost 12
W#1 SinglesBrittani Hradsky vs Angela Palladino6-1, 6-0
L#2 SinglesKathryn Panek vs Cally Turner2-6, 0-6
L#3 SinglesTania Brewer vs Jordan Watkins1-6, 1-6
2024-11-07vs Knight/Seligman/PCCLost 12
L#1 SinglesRachel Cockrell vs Cathy Knight2-6, 3-6
W#2 SinglesKathryn Panek vs Katie Hernandez6-4, 7-5
L#3 SinglesTania Brewer vs Melissa Ferjuste0-6, 3-6
2024-11-06vs Cooper/Fayetteville/FACLost 12
W#1 SinglesBrittani Hradsky vs Maya Kushmaul6-1, 6-3
L#2 SinglesRachel Cockrell vs Ellen Kinnamon1-6, 0-6
L#3 SinglesTania Brewer vs Nora Cooper1-6, 0-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 2.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.48 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.81
Brittani Hradsky
usually #1 Singles 80%, also #3 Singles 20% · published 3
2.68
Melissa McCarty
published
2.53
Kathryn Panek
usually #2 Singles 75%, also #3 Singles 25% · published
2.30
Rachel Cockrell
usually #2 Singles 67%, also #1 Singles 33% · published
2.08
Tania Brewer
usually #3 Singles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Melissa McCarty + Rachel Cockrell303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Brittani Hradsky
13W–9L career · 5 lines in 2024
1%89%9%
2.81
Melissa McCarty
11W–9L career · no lines in 2024
0%9%91%
2.68
Kathryn Panek
19W–7L career · 4 lines in 2024
0%40%60%
2.53
Rachel Cockrell
12W–16L career · 3 lines in 2024
0%92%8%
2.30
Tania Brewer
9W–11L career · 4 lines in 2024
0%>99%<1%
2.08

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.