Teams

Slice & Dice

2022 DC WTA Singles · DC WTA Singles 3.0 Men

5 players · average NTRP 3.17 / WASHINGTON D.C.

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2022-09-17vs Piney RunWon 21
W#1 SinglesOlugbenga Okubadejo vs Jon Anders6-2, 6-1
L#2 SinglesPeter Levine vs Mark Hill3-6, 4-3
W#3 SinglesDaren Bakst vs Thomas Calhoun6-2, 6-2
2022-09-17vs Piney RunLost 02
L#1 SinglesWei Fu vs Mark Hill0-6, 0-6
L#2 SinglesDaren Bakst vs Victor Sanchez2-6, 2-6
2022-08-28vs Piney RunLost 02
L#1 SinglesPeter Tice vs Victor Sanchez1-6, 3-6
L#2 SinglesPeter Levine vs Thomas Calhoun1-6, 2-4
2022-08-27vs Piney RunLost 12
W#1 SinglesOlugbenga Okubadejo vs Victor Sanchez6-3, 6-4
L#2 SinglesPeter Levine vs Mark Hill4-6, 0-4
L#3 SinglesWei Fu vs Desmond LaMar2-6, 6-6
2022-08-20vs Piney RunWon 20
W#1 SinglesOlugbenga Okubadejo vs Jon Anders6-2, 6-3
W#2 SinglesDaren Bakst vs Tony Feric6-3, 6-4
2022-08-17vs Piney RunLost 02
L#1 SinglesDaren Bakst vs Victor Sanchez1-6, 2-6
L#2 SinglesPeter Levine vs Tony Feric1-6, 4-5
2022-08-13vs Piney RunWon 21
W#1 SinglesOlugbenga Okubadejo vs Thomas Calhoun6-3, 6-2
W#2 SinglesDaren Bakst vs Sidney Williams6-7, 5-0
L#3 SinglesPeter Levine vs Desmond LaMar5-7, 2-4
2022-07-30vs Piney RunLost 02
L#1 SinglesPeter Tice vs Mark Hill1-6, 3-6
L#3 SinglesWei Fu vs Tony Feric1-6, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings2 teams · DC WTA Singles 3.0 Men
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Piney Run5315917161
2Slice & Dice3591529218

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.98 estimated across 3 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.35
Olugbenga Okubadejo
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #2 Singles 17% · published 3.5
2.96
Wei Fu
usually #3 Singles 67%, also #1 Singles 33% · published
Daren Bakst
usually #2 Singles 60%, also #1 Singles 20% · published 3
2.63
Peter Tice
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 3
Peter Levine
usually #2 Singles 67%, also #3 Singles 33% · published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Olugbenga Okubadejo
256W–211L career · 6 lines in 2022
<1%88%12%
3.35
Wei Fu
12W–11L career · 3 lines in 2022
<1%61%39%
2.96
3
Daren Bakst
15W–22L career · 5 lines in 2022
not enough data
3
Peter Tice
45W–74L career · 2 lines in 2022
15%85%<1%
2.63
Peter Levine
9W–26L career · 6 lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.