Teams

Piney Run

2022 DC WTA Singles · DC WTA Singles 3.0 Men

8 players · average NTRP 3.00 / WASHINGTON D.C.

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2022-09-17vs Slice & DiceWon 21
W#1 SinglesMark Hill vs Wei Fu6-0, 6-0
W#2 SinglesVictor Sanchez vs Daren Bakst6-2, 6-2
L#3 SinglesJon Anders vs Todd Whatley4-6, 3-3
2022-09-17vs Slice & DiceLost 12
L#1 SinglesJon Anders vs Olugbenga Okubadejo2-6, 1-6
W#2 SinglesMark Hill vs Peter Levine6-3, 3-4
L#3 SinglesThomas Calhoun vs Daren Bakst2-6, 2-6
2022-08-28vs Slice & DiceWon 30
W#1 SinglesVictor Sanchez vs Peter Tice6-1, 6-3
W#2 SinglesThomas Calhoun vs Peter Levine6-1, 4-2
W#3 SinglesJon Anders vs Todd Eisenstadt6-1, 6-1
2022-08-27vs Slice & DiceWon 21
L#1 SinglesVictor Sanchez vs Olugbenga Okubadejo3-6, 4-6
W#2 SinglesMark Hill vs Peter Levine6-4, 4-0
W#3 SinglesDesmond LaMar vs Wei Fu6-2, 6-6
2022-08-20vs Slice & DiceLost 02
L#1 SinglesJon Anders vs Olugbenga Okubadejo2-6, 3-6
L#3 SinglesMartin Booker vs Todd Whatley3-6, 0-6
2022-08-17vs Slice & DiceWon 20
W#1 SinglesVictor Sanchez vs Daren Bakst6-1, 6-2
W#3 SinglesThomas Calhoun vs Todd Whatley6-1, 5-3
2022-08-13vs Slice & DiceLost 12
L#1 SinglesThomas Calhoun vs Olugbenga Okubadejo3-6, 2-6
L#2 SinglesSidney Williams vs Daren Bakst7-6, 0-5
W#3 SinglesDesmond LaMar vs Peter Levine7-5, 4-2
2022-07-30vs Slice & DiceWon 20
W#1 SinglesMark Hill vs Peter Tice6-1, 6-3
W#2 SinglesJon Anders vs Todd Whatley6-0, 6-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings2 teams · DC WTA Singles 3.0 Men
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Piney Run5315917161
2Slice & Dice3591529218

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.96 estimated across 4 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.32
Victor Sanchez
usually #1 Singles 75%, also #2 Singles 25% · published
3.22
Jon Anders
usually #3 Singles 40%, also #1 Singles 40% · published
2.79
Desmond LaMar
usually #3 Singles 100% · published 3
2.50
Penelope Wilson
published
Mark Hill
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #2 Singles 50% · published
Martin Booker
usually #3 Singles 100% · published
Sidney Williams
usually #2 Singles 100% · published
Thomas Calhoun
usually #3 Singles 50%, also #1 Singles 25% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Jon Anders + Victor Sanchez303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Victor Sanchez
32W–28L career · 4 lines in 2022
1%91%8%
3.32
Jon Anders
60W–44L career · 5 lines in 2022
4%94%2%
3.22
3
Desmond LaMar
101W–129L career · 2 lines in 2022
1%93%5%
2.79
Penelope Wilson
36W–64L career · no lines in 2022
50%50%<1%
2.50
Mark Hill
22W–13L career · 4 lines in 2022
not enough data
Martin Booker
1W–13L career · 1 line in 2022
not enough data
Sidney Williams
3W–4L career · 1 line in 2022
not enough data
Thomas Calhoun
5W–4L career · 4 lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.