Teams

PRC BLUE

2023 USTA ADULT 18 & OVER - DEN · WOMEN 3.5 - 18 & OVER

14 players · average NTRP 3.50 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2023-06-01vs CPV REDWon 10
W#1 DoublesNorine Nelson Martin / Gina Lurie vs Elizabeth Jenks / Jill Fox6-7, 6-1, 1-0
2023-05-25vs WC GREENWon 20
W#2 DoublesLisa Wiggins / Natalie Vickers vs Lisa Santos / Shawna Saussus6-3, 6-3
W#3 DoublesErica Westphal / Courtney Mendell vs Crystal Clark / Denise Debartolomeis6-2, 6-0
2023-05-18vs SS-LT GREENSplit 11
L#1 DoublesGina Lurie / Norine Nelson Martin vs Kristi Mathieson / Melissa Wiseman5-7, 4-6
W#2 DoublesLisa Wiggins / Natalie Vickers vs Jennifer Cree / Andrea Bailey6-2, 6-3
2023-05-11vs HRCA-S YELLOWWon 20
W#1 DoublesLisa Wiggins / Natalie Vickers vs Claudia Swanson / Brooke Sterling3-6, 6-1, 1-0
W#2 DoublesErica Westphal / Courtney Mendell vs Jessica Seidlitz / Olivia Zuncic3-6, 6-4, 1-0
2023-05-04vs LTFC GOLDWon 21
L#1 DoublesErica Westphal / Courtney Mendell vs Shelley Chism / Theresa Gilpatrick7-6, 6-7, 0-1
W#2 DoublesGina Lurie / Norine Nelson Martin vs Elaine Mariner / Debra Stamatis6-3, 6-3
W#3 DoublesLisa Wiggins / Natalie Vickers vs Margaret Fuller / Darlene Jensen-Walker6-2, 6-3
2023-04-27vs CCV REDWon 20
W#1 DoublesNatalie Vickers / Christie Dyer vs Melissa Rogers / Ashley Wilson3-6, 6-3, 1-0
W#2 DoublesErica Westphal / Courtney Mendell vs Dana Ricketts / Catherine Sinclair6-2, 6-3
2023-04-20vs PCC BLUEWon 10
W#3 DoublesGina Lurie / Norine Nelson Martin vs Nancy Sharpe / Kristi Schumacher6-1, 6-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for WOMEN 3.5 - 18 & OVER have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.22 estimated across 13 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.45
Natalie Vickers
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
3.44
Megan Kendrick
published
3.41
Wendy Mosley
published
3.39
Rachel Prudhomme
published
3.27
3.27
Erica Westphal
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
Amanda Caldwell
published 3.5
3.23
Christie Dyer
published 3.5
3.23
Cindy Sanders
published 3.5
3.19
Keenan Young
published
3.17
Gina Lurie
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.13
Sabrina Alvarez
published
2.92
Sujata Wagh
published
2.79
Courtney Mendell
published 3.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Natalie Vickers + Wendy Mosley4167% games+9.4% vs expected
Gina Lurie + Norine Nelson Martin12457% games+8.6% vs expected
Keenan Young + Christie Dyer9456% games+2.7% vs expected
Christie Dyer + Wendy Mosley8259% games+0.9% vs expected
Erica Westphal + Gina Lurie4643% games−11.2% vs expected
Sabrina Alvarez + Keenan Young224 matchesnot enough data
Keenan Young + Erica Westphal224 matchesnot enough data
Erica Westphal + Norine Nelson Martin404 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Natalie Vickers
90W–47L career · 5 lines in 2023
<1%64%36%
3.45
Megan Kendrick
16W–3L career · no lines in 2023
<1%67%33%
3.44
Wendy Mosley
27W–10L career · no lines in 2023
<1%74%26%
3.41
Rachel Prudhomme
10W–4L career · no lines in 2023
<1%79%21%
3.39
Norine Nelson Martin
28W–16L career · no lines in 2023
3%92%5%
3.27
3.5
Erica Westphal
83W–76L career · 4 lines in 2023
3%92%5%
3.27
3.5
Amanda Caldwell
3W–5L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
3.5
Christie Dyer
24W–15L career · no lines in 2023
5%92%3%
3.23
3.5
Cindy Sanders
17W–22L career · no lines in 2023
5%92%3%
3.23
Keenan Young
34W–23L career · no lines in 2023
9%90%1%
3.19
3.5
Gina Lurie
108W–107L career · 4 lines in 2023
12%87%1%
3.17
Sabrina Alvarez
14W–17L career · no lines in 2023
19%81%<1%
3.13
Sujata Wagh
4W–4L career · no lines in 2023
<1%71%29%
2.92
3.5
Courtney Mendell
5W–0L career · no lines in 2023
94%6%<1%
2.79

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.