Teams

WC GREEN

2023 USTA ADULT 18 & OVER - DEN · WOMEN 3.5 - 18 & OVER

10 players · average NTRP 3.58 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2023-06-01vs SS-LT GREENWon 21
W#1 DoublesCrystal Clark / Sara Watson vs CELESTE SIADE / Kimberly Kurban6-0, 7-5
W#1 SinglesAmy Wiedeman vs Jennifer Cree4-6, 7-5, 1-0
L#2 SinglesStacy Masur vs Vanessa Parsons2-6, 3-6
2023-05-25vs PRC BLUELost 05
L#1 DoublesAnasa Shank / Melanie Adams vs Norine Nelson Martin / Wendy Mosley4-6, 2-6
L#1 SinglesAmy Wiedeman vs Rachel Prudhomme6-3, 3-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesLisa Santos / Shawna Saussus vs Lisa Wiggins / Natalie Vickers3-6, 3-6
L#2 SinglesLiz Holt vs Keenan Young1-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesCrystal Clark / Denise Debartolomeis vs Erica Westphal / Courtney Mendell2-6, 0-6
2023-05-22vs LTFC GOLDWon 32
W#1 DoublesCrystal Clark / Anasa Shank vs Shelley Chism / Theresa Gilpatrick5-7, 6-3, 1-0
W#1 SinglesMelanie Adams vs Taylor Barnes7-5, 6-1
L#2 DoublesStacy Masur / Liz Holt vs Elaine Mariner / Debra Stamatis2-6, 4-6
W#2 SinglesLisa Santos vs Lindsay Piepgras7-5, 5-7, 1-0
L#3 DoublesStephanie Burt / Denise Debartolomeis vs Darlene Jensen-Walker / Linda Murray3-6, 6-1, 0-1
2023-05-18vs HRCA-S YELLOWWon 40
W#1 DoublesStacy Masur / Anasa Shank vs Kathleen Samuelli / Jessica Seidlitz7-5, 6-1
W#1 SinglesLiz Holt vs Shelby Striegel7-5, 3-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesShawna Saussus / Crystal Clark vs Brooke Sterling / Olivia Zuncic6-3, 7-6
W#3 DoublesStephanie Burt / Denise Debartolomeis vs Gretchen Burr / Diana Youssef6-0, 4-6, 1-0
2023-05-06vs PCC BLUEWon 31
L#1 DoublesAnasa Shank / Amy Wiedeman vs Lynsey Adragna / Kelci Newlin3-6, 1-6
W#2 DoublesMelanie Adams / Sara Watson vs Tina Newlin / Stacey Griffin6-2, 6-4
W#2 SinglesStacy Masur vs Cait Dutcher7-5, 6-4
W#3 DoublesStephanie Burt / Liz Holt vs Kristi Schumacher / Nancy Sharpe6-1, 6-2
2023-05-04vs CCV REDWon 32
W#1 DoublesMelanie Adams / Sara Watson vs Catherine Sinclair / Dana Ricketts6-3, 6-0
L#1 SinglesAmy Wiedeman vs Melissa Rogers2-6, 0-6
W#2 DoublesLisa Santos / Anasa Shank vs Monica Bogue / Jill Filene3-6, 6-3, 1-0
L#2 SinglesStephanie Burt vs Ashley Wilson2-6, 2-6
W#3 DoublesCrystal Clark / Denise Debartolomeis vs Allyson Ross / Seon Comeau6-3, 4-3
2023-04-20vs CPV REDWon 50
W#1 DoublesMelanie Adams / Sara Watson vs Stephanie Lanziner / Jami Keenan6-3, 6-2
W#1 SinglesAmy Wiedeman vs Carol Lail6-1, 6-1
W#2 DoublesLiz Holt / Lisa Santos vs Mary Lostak / Liz Bauer6-3, 6-7, 1-0
W#2 SinglesShawna Saussus vs Jillian Williams5-7, 7-5, 1-0
W#3 DoublesStephanie Burt / Anasa Shank vs Elizabeth Zeller / Jill Fox6-3, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for WOMEN 3.5 - 18 & OVER have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.15 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.58
Anasa Shank
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 17% · published 4
Crystal Clark
usually #3 Doubles 40%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
3.24
Lisa Santos
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #2 Singles 25% · published
3.21
Liz Holt
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published 3.5
3.12
Melanie Adams
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #1 Singles 20% · published
3.09
Shawna Saussus
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #2 Singles 33% · published
3.07
Denise Debartolomeis
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.05
Stacy Masur
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.04
Stephanie Burt
usually #3 Doubles 80%, also #2 Singles 20% · published
2.93
Amy Wiedeman
usually #1 Singles 80%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published 3.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Melanie Adams + Stephanie Burt3258% games+5.3% vs expected
Stacy Masur + Crystal Clark4649% games+4.4% vs expected
Shawna Saussus + Crystal Clark3254% games+3.0% vs expected
Stacy Masur + Shawna Saussus272154% games+1.9% vs expected
Melanie Adams + Stacy Masur2449% games+1.1% vs expected
Melanie Adams + Shawna Saussus3448% games−0.4% vs expected
Denise Debartolomeis + Liz Holt2540% games−7.8% vs expected
Melanie Adams + Amy Wiedeman4157% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Anasa Shank
100W–51L career · type A · 6 lines in 2023
27%73%<1%
3.58
3.5
Crystal Clark
59W–52L career · 5 lines in 2023
not enough data
Lisa Santos
27W–32L career · 4 lines in 2023
3%94%2%
3.24
3.5
Liz Holt
40W–46L career · 5 lines in 2023
6%93%1%
3.21
Melanie Adams
59W–48L career · 5 lines in 2023
19%81%<1%
3.12
Shawna Saussus
51W–41L career · 3 lines in 2023
24%76%<1%
3.09
3.5
Denise Debartolomeis
83W–107L career · 4 lines in 2023
30%70%<1%
3.07
3.5
Stacy Masur
101W–118L career · 4 lines in 2023
36%64%<1%
3.05
Stephanie Burt
50W–53L career · 5 lines in 2023
37%63%<1%
3.04
3.5
Amy Wiedeman
36W–30L career · 5 lines in 2023
69%31%<1%
2.93

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.