Teams

GCC GOLD

2024 USTA ADULT 18 & OVER - DEN · WOMEN 2.5 - 18 & OVER

10 players · average NTRP 2.88 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2024-05-29vs EM GREENWon 10
W#1 DoublesMarissa Sproles / Ilana Larson vs Cheri Wrench / Christina Jensen6-0, 6-2
2024-05-22vs PTC GREENWon 10
W#2 DoublesIlana Larson / Marissa Sproles vs Ashley Hunt / Elizabeth Barnes6-2, 6-2
2024-05-15vs VC BLUEWon 20
W#1 DoublesMarissa Sproles / Ilana Larson vs Vineeta Laxminarayan / Nancy Fridstein6-1, 6-2
W#2 DoublesAndrea Ellsworth / NICOLE WADSWORTH vs Joanie Mankus / Traci Samaras6-4, 7-5
2024-05-08vs GAC GREENWon 10
W#1 DoublesIlana Larson / Marissa Sproles vs Shelley Maloney / Lisa Friar6-4, 7-5
2024-05-01vs CHCC PURPLEWon 10
W#2 DoublesIlana Larson / Marissa Sproles vs Jordan Mahoney / Monica Zakovich6-0, 6-0
2024-04-24vs WP-G YELLOWWon 10
W#1 DoublesNICOLE WADSWORTH / Andrea Ellsworth vs Grace McLaughlin / Kathleen Trimble6-2, 3-6, 1-0
2024-04-17vs GNO REDWon 10
W#1 DoublesAndrea Ellsworth / NICOLE WADSWORTH vs Lauren Turra / Meredith Johnson1-6, 6-4, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for WOMEN 2.5 - 18 & OVER have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.64 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.87
Andrea Ellsworth
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.83
Meghan Callaway
published
2.68
Judith Pearson
published
2.66
Marissa Sproles
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 3
2.63
Ilana Larson
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 3
2.62
Sonya Kubik
published
2.53
NICOLE WADSWORTH
published
2.51
Kathryn Briggs
published
2.41
Katie Terwilliger
published
Alicia Sloan
published 2.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

NICOLE WADSWORTH + Andrea Ellsworth6254% games+5.0% vs expected
Ilana Larson + Marissa Sproles452655% games−3.6% vs expected
Marissa Sproles + Andrea Ellsworth4259% gamesnot enough data
Ilana Larson + Andrea Ellsworth134 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Andrea Ellsworth
50W–20L career · 3 lines in 2024
<1%81%18%
2.87
Meghan Callaway
17W–5L career · no lines in 2024
1%88%11%
2.83
Judith Pearson
9W–8L career · no lines in 2024
10%89%1%
2.68
3
Marissa Sproles
61W–44L career · 5 lines in 2024
13%87%1%
2.66
3
Ilana Larson
72W–55L career · 5 lines in 2024
17%82%<1%
2.63
Sonya Kubik
4W–6L career · no lines in 2024
20%79%<1%
2.62
NICOLE WADSWORTH
7W–7L career · no lines in 2024
43%57%<1%
2.53
Kathryn Briggs
6W–8L career · no lines in 2024
47%53%<1%
2.51
Katie Terwilliger
5W–8L career · no lines in 2024
74%26%<1%
2.41
2.5
Alicia Sloan
2W–5L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.