Teams

VC BLUE

2024 USTA ADULT 18 & OVER - DEN · WOMEN 2.5 - 18 & OVER

8 players · average NTRP 2.83 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2024-05-29vs PTC GREENWon 10
W#1 DoublesNancy Fridstein / Elizabeth Likovich vs Hayley Servatius / Katie Shader6-1, 6-1
2024-05-22vs GAC GREENLost 01
L#1 DoublesNancy Fridstein / Elizabeth Likovich vs Lisa Friar / Betsy Berman3-6, 1-6
2024-05-15vs GCC GOLDLost 02
L#1 SinglesElizabeth Likovich vs Alicia Sloan4-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesJoanie Mankus / Traci Samaras vs Andrea Ellsworth / NICOLE WADSWORTH4-6, 5-7
2024-05-08vs CHCC PURPLEWon 10
W#1 DoublesTraci Samaras / Elizabeth Likovich vs Alyssa Mischell / Sarah Burney6-3, 6-1
2024-05-01vs WP-G YELLOWLost 01
L#2 DoublesMolly Weaver / Elizabeth Likovich vs Pam Silverberg / Kristin Stefanatz6-4, 5-7, 0-1
2024-04-24vs GNO REDSplit 11
W#1 DoublesNancy Fridstein / Traci Samaras vs Meredith Johnson / Kacie Dienstbach4-6, 6-3, 1-0
L#2 DoublesElizabeth Likovich / Molly Weaver vs Marni Warren / Sonya Ziolkowski3-6, 1-6
2024-04-17vs EM GREENLost 01
L#1 DoublesElizabeth Likovich / Chrissy Musgrove vs Cheri Wrench / Jill van Abbema3-6, 7-6, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for WOMEN 2.5 - 18 & OVER have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.51 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.91
Chrissy Musgrove
published 3
2.83
Molly Weaver
published
2.55
Elizabeth Likovich
usually #1 Doubles 57%, also #2 Doubles 29% · published 3
2.43
2.41
Traci Samaras
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 2.5
2.28
Nancy Fridstein
published
2.15
Meridith Burrows
published
Joanie Mankus
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Traci Samaras + Meridith Burrows4449% games+2.7% vs expected
Traci Samaras + Vineeta Laxminarayan7066% games+0.9% vs expected
Traci Samaras + Nancy Fridstein4155% gamesnot enough data
Traci Samaras + Elizabeth Likovich314 matchesnot enough data
Molly Weaver + Chrissy Musgrove404 matchesnot enough data
Elizabeth Likovich + Nancy Fridstein303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Chrissy Musgrove
38W–2L career · no lines in 2024
<1%73%27%
2.91
Molly Weaver
18W–11L career · no lines in 2024
1%88%11%
2.83
3
Elizabeth Likovich
27W–34L career · 7 lines in 2024
36%64%<1%
2.55
Vineeta Laxminarayan
11W–10L career · no lines in 2024
0%70%30%
2.43
2.5
Traci Samaras
68W–37L career · 3 lines in 2024
0%74%26%
2.41
Nancy Fridstein
16W–26L career · no lines in 2024
0%95%5%
2.28
Meridith Burrows
26W–14L career · no lines in 2024
0%99%1%
2.15
Joanie Mankus
2W–7L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.