Teams

Senioritas

2025 USTA ADULT 55 and OVER - BOISE · TV

14 players · average NTRP 3.80 / IDAHO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule1 played
2025-07-15vs Sister SqadLost 01
L#1 DoublesTeresa Comiskey / Jennifer Mitchell vs Kayce McEwan / Holly Johnson6-2, 4-6, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for TV have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.49 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.14
Jennifer McEntee
published 4
3.96
Vicki McBride
published
3.80
Jenny Grunke
published 4
3.53
Angela Larsen
published 4
3.44
3.43
Jane Perlaky
published 3.5
3.35
Kimberlee Megale
published 3.5
3.27
Barbara Miller
published 3.5
3.27
Maria Turner
published 4
3.19
Diane Daniel
published 3.5
3.04
Kelli Fredback
published
Robin Fisher
published
Teresa Comiskey
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Jennifer Mitchell + Jane Perlaky243647% games+0.3% vs expected
Mary Lynne Schilling + Jenny Grunke454053% games−1.6% vs expected
Jennifer McEntee + Angela Larsen412758% games−3.3% vs expected
Kelli Fredback + Barbara Miller81645% gamesnot enough data
Kelli Fredback + Jennifer McEntee6457% gamesnot enough data
Kelli Fredback + Maria Turner2838% gamesnot enough data
Angela Larsen + Jenny Grunke4352% gamesnot enough data
Angela Larsen + Barbara Miller3251% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Jennifer McEntee
78W–43L career · no lines in 2025
<1%16%84%
4.14
Vicki McBride
154W–127L career · no lines in 2025
<1%62%38%
3.96
4
Jenny Grunke
168W–146L career · no lines in 2025
2%91%8%
3.80
4
Angela Larsen
77W–60L career · type A · no lines in 2025
40%60%<1%
3.53
4
Mary Lynne Schilling
57W–58L career · no lines in 2025
67%33%<1%
3.44
3.5
Jane Perlaky
145W–183L career · type A · no lines in 2025
<1%68%32%
3.43
3.5
Kimberlee Megale
183W–106L career · no lines in 2025
1%86%14%
3.35
3.5
Barbara Miller
68W–53L career · no lines in 2025
3%92%5%
3.27
4
Maria Turner
116W–139L career · no lines in 2025
95%5%<1%
3.27
3.5
Diane Daniel
3W–7L career · no lines in 2025
9%90%1%
3.19
4
Jennifer Mitchell
164W–142L career · no lines in 2025
>99%<1%<1%
3.04
Kelli Fredback
14W–22L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Robin Fisher
19W–17L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Teresa Comiskey
23W–30L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.