Teams

RS-WILCOX

2026 MATA USTA Southern Combo 18 & Over - Summer · 8.5 Women

10 players · average NTRP 4.17 / GEORGIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
2026-08-16vs HOCO-BENDALLWon 20
W#1 DoublesFlorence Thompson / Rhonda Harris vs Patsy Bendall / Tuti Hawkins8-1
W#2 DoublesCaroline Smith / Jennifer Hornsby vs Chrystal Wasden / Amanda Woods8-3
2026-08-16vs HOCO-BENDALLWon 10
W#1 DoublesLisa Wilcox / Lou Holmes vs Sally Velasquez / Valerie Beaman-Hackle8-4
2026-08-16vs HOCO-BENDALLWon 20
W#1 DoublesLisa Wilcox / Whitley Carter vs Patsy Bendall / Frances Clay8-1
W#2 DoublesDannita Stanley / Haley Yarbrough vs Chrystal Wasden / Julie Redick8-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings1 teams · 8.5 Women
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1RS-WILCOX3090011

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.09 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.46
Rhonda Harris
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
4.35
Patricia Clevenger
published
4.24
Dannita Stanley
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
4.23
Whitley Carter
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
4.05
Jennifer Hornsby
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.95
Florence Thompson
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.92
Lauren Folsom
published
3.91
Lisa Wilcox
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.89
Haley Yarbrough
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.88
Lou Holmes
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Rhonda Harris + Jennifer Hornsby404 matchesnot enough data
Jennifer Hornsby + Dannita Stanley303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Rhonda Harris
52W–17L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%61%39%
4.46
Patricia Clevenger
20W–7L career · no lines in 2026
<1%87%13%
4.35
4.5
Dannita Stanley
13W–13L career · 1 line in 2026
3%94%2%
4.24
Whitley Carter
5W–5L career · 1 line in 2026
4%94%2%
4.23
Jennifer Hornsby
34W–21L career · 1 line in 2026
34%66%<1%
4.05
4
Florence Thompson
33W–10L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%64%36%
3.95
Lauren Folsom
15W–4L career · no lines in 2026
<1%73%27%
3.92
Lisa Wilcox
38W–12L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%76%24%
3.91
4
Haley Yarbrough
39W–9L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%80%19%
3.89
Lou Holmes
9W–3L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%82%18%
3.88

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.