Teams

HOCO-BENDALL

2026 MATA USTA Southern Combo 18 & Over - Summer · 8.5 Women

9 players · average NTRP 3.50 / GEORGIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
2026-08-16vs RS-WILCOXLost 02
L#1 DoublesPatsy Bendall / Tuti Hawkins vs Florence Thompson / Rhonda Harris1-8
L#2 DoublesChrystal Wasden / Amanda Woods vs Caroline Smith / Jennifer Hornsby3-8
2026-08-16vs RS-WILCOXLost 02
L#1 DoublesSally Velasquez / Valerie Beaman-Hackle vs Lisa Wilcox / Lou Holmes4-8
L#2 DoublesAmanda Woods / Tuti Hawkins vs Caroline Smith / Melissa Turner1-8
2026-08-16vs RS-WILCOXLost 02
L#1 DoublesPatsy Bendall / Frances Clay vs Lisa Wilcox / Whitley Carter1-8
L#2 DoublesChrystal Wasden / Julie Redick vs Dannita Stanley / Haley Yarbrough1-8
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 8.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.41 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.85
Sally Velasquez
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.81
Valerie Beaman-Hackle
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.54
Patsy Bendall
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.48
Stacy Byrd
published
3.39
Tuti Hawkins
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
3.32
Julie Redick
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.17
Frances Clay
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.08
Amanda Woods
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.08
Chrystal Wasden
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Stacy Byrd + Frances Clay3450% games−0.1% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Sally Velasquez
24W–11L career · 1 line in 2026
1%85%15%
3.85
Valerie Beaman-Hackle
5W–6L career · 1 line in 2026
1%90%8%
3.81
Patsy Bendall
27W–39L career · 2 lines in 2026
40%60%<1%
3.54
Stacy Byrd
44W–29L career · no lines in 2026
<1%56%44%
3.48
Tuti Hawkins
50W–47L career · 2 lines in 2026
79%21%<1%
3.39
Julie Redick
13W–26L career · 1 line in 2026
1%89%10%
3.32
Frances Clay
10W–30L career · 1 line in 2026
99%1%<1%
3.17
3.5
Amanda Woods
15W–29L career · 6 lines in 2026
29%71%<1%
3.08
3.5
Chrystal Wasden
8W–14L career · 2 lines in 2026
30%70%<1%
3.08

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.