Teams

LA - Got Balls

2024 SoCal Tri-Level - LA · LA - Women 5.0

16 players · average NTRP 4.50 / SO.CALIFORNIA

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2024-09-08vs SoCal/Harstein/Tri-Level5.0WLost 02
L#1 DoublesLeticia Alcala / Melanie McClain vs Jacqueline Resler / Jennifer Cotone Gossett4-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesChristine Chen / Kristina Chen vs April Hartstein / Chandler Nguyen2-6, 2-6
2024-09-07vs LA - Alley CatsWon 21
W#1 DoublesLeticia Alcala / Stephanie Ellis vs Kelley Fox / Jessica Widmark Hillman6-3, 6-4
W#2 DoublesMandi Collier / Yuri Nichelson vs Kelly Kenney / Shanna Reznik6-0, 6-3
L#3 DoublesAmy Hasquet / Lorna Kim vs Cindi Carter / Stephanie Perry6-7, 6-3, 0-1
2024-08-25vs SoCal/Harstein/Tri-Level5.0WLost 02
L#2 DoublesChristine Chen / Kristina Chen vs Darcy Simon / Amy Thompson3-6, 5-7
L#3 DoublesBerthy Feng / Lorna Kim vs Danielle Perrigue / Jessica Lee0-6, 3-6
2024-08-24vs LA - Alley CatsWon 21
W#1 DoublesStephanie Ellis / Leticia Alcala vs Kelley Fox / Lauren DiFazio7-6, 6-4
L#2 DoublesChi Rauen / Kristina Chen vs Tai Sisson / Emma Silber2-6, 2-6
W#3 DoublesAmy Hasquet / Lorna Kim vs Meera Prasad / Kristin McQueen1-6, 6-1, 1-0
2024-08-17vs SoCal/Harstein/Tri-Level5.0WSplit 11
L#2 DoublesChristina Catipay / Chi Rauen vs April Hartstein / Carolyn Atchison3-6, 6-7
W#3 DoublesAmy Hasquet / Karen Indeglia vs Michelle van Oppen / Sona Arutyunyan1-6, 6-4, 1-0
2024-08-11vs LA - Alley CatsWon 21
W#1 DoublesLeticia Alcala / Kim Kinberg vs Kelley Fox / Andrea Madrigal6-1, 6-1
L#2 DoublesYuri Nichelson / Chi Rauen vs Cynthia Chou / Brynna Pietz4-6, 1-6
W#3 DoublesJana Conley / Karen Indeglia vs Leslie Ho / Claudine Stanley6-2, 6-2
2024-07-20vs SoCal/Harstein/Tri-Level5.0WSplit 11
W#1 DoublesKim Kinberg / Melanie McClain vs Jennifer Azevedo / Proyfon Lohaphaisan7-5, 6-3
L#2 DoublesSerena Davis / Christina Catipay vs April Hartstein / Erica Smalley4-6, 2-6
2024-07-07vs LA - Alley CatsLost 12
W#1 DoublesKim Kinberg / Stephanie MacKanic vs Andrea Madrigal / Madeleine Gandawidjaja6-4, 2-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesJennifer Berman / Karen Hankinson vs Lauren DiFazio / Lisa Novajosky1-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesJana Conley / Karen Indeglia vs Jennifer Lichtman / Kristin McQueen3-6, 4-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for LA - Women 5.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.21 estimated across 15 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.77
Kim Kinberg
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 5
Anna Lowy
published 5
4.69
Mandi Collier
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 5
4.60
Leticia Alcala
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 5
4.48
Yuri Nichelson
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
4.46
Stephanie MacKanic
published
4.42
Melanie McClain
published
4.36
Karen Hankinson
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
4.33
Kristina Chen
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 4.5
4.21
Christine Chen
published 4.5
4.16
Chi Rauen
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
4.07
Christina Catipay
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
3.71
Karen Indeglia
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.68
Lorna Kim
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 4
3.58
Jana Conley
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.57
Amy Hasquet
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 4
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Yuri Nichelson + Mandi Collier16861% games+8.4% vs expected
Kristina Chen + Christine Chen11558% games−5.0% vs expected
Kim Kinberg + Leticia Alcala10656% games−7.1% vs expected
Yuri Nichelson + Leticia Alcala12465% gamesnot enough data
Jana Conley + Karen Indeglia2734% gamesnot enough data
Chi Rauen + Christina Catipay2542% gamesnot enough data
Christina Catipay + Kristina Chen4263% gamesnot enough data
Leticia Alcala + Mandi Collier3352% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

5
Kim Kinberg
45W–23L career · 3 lines in 2024
no projection at this level
4.77
5
Anna Lowy
0W–1L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
5
Mandi Collier
188W–89L career · 3 lines in 2024
no projection at this level
4.69
5
Leticia Alcala
160W–102L career · 4 lines in 2024
no projection at this level
4.60
4.5
Yuri Nichelson
206W–73L career · 2 lines in 2024
<1%56%44%
4.48
Stephanie MacKanic
4W–3L career · no lines in 2024
no projection at this level
4.46
Melanie McClain
1W–4L career · no lines in 2024
no projection at this level
4.42
4.5
Karen Hankinson
131W–70L career · 1 line in 2024
1%84%15%
4.36
4.5
Kristina Chen
152W–91L career · 6 lines in 2024
1%88%12%
4.33
4.5
Christine Chen
12W–12L career · no lines in 2024
6%92%2%
4.21
4.5
Chi Rauen
168W–150L career · 3 lines in 2024
13%87%1%
4.16
4.5
Christina Catipay
136W–105L career · 2 lines in 2024
30%70%<1%
4.07
4
Karen Indeglia
50W–51L career · 3 lines in 2024
6%92%2%
3.71
4
Lorna Kim
210W–162L career · 5 lines in 2024
10%89%1%
3.68
4
Jana Conley
40W–83L career · 2 lines in 2024
30%70%<1%
3.58
4
Amy Hasquet
92W–169L career · 6 lines in 2024
30%70%<1%
3.57

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.