Teams

RENO TENNIS CENTER CW8.5A-DT

2025 COMBO - Daytime · Women 8.5

12 players · average NTRP 4.12 / NO. CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2025-10-24vs TAHOE DONNER CW8.5A-DTLost 12
L#1 DoublesLisa Abbott / Gina Harris vs Andrea Park / Dawn Schlagel1-6, 5-7
W#2 DoublesHolly Tappan / Debra Ziegler vs Alicia Deffebach / CAREY Corfield7-6, 6-3
L#3 DoublesJennifer Bentley / Jenna Tempkin vs Jana Acri / Lisa Dierking6-2, 5-7, 0-1
2025-10-08vs TAHOE DONNER CW8.5A-DTLost 02
L#1 DoublesChristie Cooley / Gina Harris vs Andrea Park / Lisa Dierking2-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesMeghan Lewis / Laura Pierce vs Jana Acri / Kelly Hankins6-7, 4-6
2025-10-03vs TAHOE DONNER CW8.5A-DTWon 21
W#1 DoublesHolly Tappan / Jennifer Pereos vs Jana Acri / Caryn Swobe6-2, 6-2
L#2 DoublesLisa Abbott / Laura Pierce vs Andrea Park / Teresa Johnston6-4, 2-6, 0-1
W#3 DoublesJessica Lankton / Angela Bader vs Alexis Robison / Kelly Sparks6-2, 7-6
2025-09-24vs TAHOE DONNER CW8.5A-DTLost 12
W#1 DoublesJessica Lankton / Lisa Rutz vs Jana Acri / Lisa Dierking7-6, 7-6
L#2 DoublesMeghan Lewis / Angela Bader vs Lucretia Conklin / Teresa Johnston4-6, 0-6
L#3 DoublesChristie Cooley / Jennifer Bentley vs Andrea Park / Kelly Hankins0-6, 1-6
2025-09-15vs TAHOE DONNER CW8.5A-DTWon 21
W#1 DoublesLaura Pierce / Holly Tappan vs Kelly Sparks / Alexis Robison7-5, 6-1
L#2 DoublesGina Harris / Lisa Rutz vs Alicia Deffebach / CAREY Corfield3-6, 4-6
W#3 DoublesJessica Lankton / Jennifer Pereos vs Janet Peterson / Lisa Dierking7-5, 6-0
2025-09-12vs TAHOE DONNER CW8.5A-DTWon 21
W#1 DoublesChristie Cooley / Gina Harris vs Alexis Robison / Kelly Sparks6-3, 6-7, 1-0
W#2 DoublesHolly Tappan / Anne Inda vs Janet Peterson / Kelly Hankins7-5, 6-1
L#3 DoublesLaura Pierce / Debra Ziegler vs Lea Knop / Dawn Schlagel6-4, 1-6, 0-1
2025-09-02vs TAHOE DONNER CW8.5A-DTWon 21
W#1 DoublesJennifer Pereos / Holly Tappan vs CAREY Corfield / Alicia Deffebach6-0, 6-4
L#2 DoublesLisa Rutz / Christie Cooley vs Caryn Swobe / Andrea Park6-3, 1-6, 0-1
W#3 DoublesJennifer Bentley / Meghan Lewis vs Kelly Sparks / Lynette van Dell6-2, 1-6, 1-0
2025-08-29vs TAHOE DONNER CW8.5A-DTWon 30
W#1 DoublesChristie Cooley / Angela Bader vs Lucretia Conklin / Teresa Johnston6-3, 7-6
W#2 DoublesJenna Tempkin / Anne Inda vs Lea Knop / Kelly Hankins6-4, 5-7, 1-0
W#3 DoublesHolly Tappan / Debra Ziegler vs Janet Peterson / Dawn Schlagel6-4, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Women 8.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.08 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.54
Holly Tappan
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
4.49
Jessica Lankton
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
4.26
Christie Cooley
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published 4.5
4.06
Jenna Tempkin
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
4.00
Jennifer Pereos
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
4.00
Debra Ziegler
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.97
Anne Inda
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.96
Angela Bader
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.89
Lisa Rutz
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
3.65
Jennifer Bentley
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Lisa Abbott
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
Meghan Lewis
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Christie Cooley + Jessica Lankton303 matchesnot enough data
Holly Tappan + Jessica Lankton303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Holly Tappan
40W–4L career · 6 lines in 2025
<1%40%60%
4.54
Jessica Lankton
13W–3L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%54%46%
4.49
4.5
Christie Cooley
23W–8L career · 5 lines in 2025
3%93%4%
4.26
Jenna Tempkin
3W–8L career · 2 lines in 2025
33%67%<1%
4.06
Jennifer Pereos
44W–9L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%49%51%
4.00
4
Debra Ziegler
17W–14L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%51%49%
4.00
4
Anne Inda
14W–3L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%57%43%
3.97
4
Angela Bader
17W–13L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%63%37%
3.96
Lisa Rutz
8W–9L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%78%22%
3.89
Jennifer Bentley
6W–16L career · 3 lines in 2025
14%86%1%
3.65
Lisa Abbott
1W–6L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
Meghan Lewis
5W–6L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.