Teams

TAHOE DONNER CW8.5A-DT

2025 COMBO - Daytime · Women 8.5

15 players · average NTRP 4.25 / NO. CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2025-10-24vs RENO TENNIS CENTER CW8.5A-DTWon 21
W#1 DoublesAndrea Park / Dawn Schlagel vs Lisa Abbott / Gina Harris6-1, 7-5
L#2 DoublesAlicia Deffebach / CAREY Corfield vs Holly Tappan / Debra Ziegler6-7, 3-6
W#3 DoublesJana Acri / Lisa Dierking vs Jennifer Bentley / Jenna Tempkin2-6, 7-5, 1-0
2025-10-08vs RENO TENNIS CENTER CW8.5A-DTWon 20
W#1 DoublesAndrea Park / Lisa Dierking vs Christie Cooley / Gina Harris6-2, 6-2
W#2 DoublesJana Acri / Kelly Hankins vs Meghan Lewis / Laura Pierce7-6, 6-4
2025-10-03vs RENO TENNIS CENTER CW8.5A-DTLost 12
L#1 DoublesJana Acri / Caryn Swobe vs Holly Tappan / Jennifer Pereos2-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesAndrea Park / Teresa Johnston vs Lisa Abbott / Laura Pierce4-6, 6-2, 1-0
L#3 DoublesAlexis Robison / Kelly Sparks vs Jessica Lankton / Angela Bader2-6, 6-7
2025-09-24vs RENO TENNIS CENTER CW8.5A-DTWon 21
L#1 DoublesJana Acri / Lisa Dierking vs Jessica Lankton / Lisa Rutz6-7, 6-7
W#2 DoublesLucretia Conklin / Teresa Johnston vs Meghan Lewis / Angela Bader6-4, 6-0
W#3 DoublesAndrea Park / Kelly Hankins vs Christie Cooley / Jennifer Bentley6-0, 6-1
2025-09-15vs RENO TENNIS CENTER CW8.5A-DTLost 12
L#1 DoublesKelly Sparks / Alexis Robison vs Laura Pierce / Holly Tappan5-7, 1-6
W#2 DoublesAlicia Deffebach / CAREY Corfield vs Gina Harris / Lisa Rutz6-3, 6-4
L#3 DoublesJanet Peterson / Lisa Dierking vs Jessica Lankton / Jennifer Pereos5-7, 0-6
2025-09-12vs RENO TENNIS CENTER CW8.5A-DTLost 12
L#1 DoublesAlexis Robison / Kelly Sparks vs Christie Cooley / Gina Harris3-6, 7-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesJanet Peterson / Kelly Hankins vs Holly Tappan / Anne Inda5-7, 1-6
W#3 DoublesLea Knop / Dawn Schlagel vs Laura Pierce / Debra Ziegler4-6, 6-1, 1-0
2025-09-02vs RENO TENNIS CENTER CW8.5A-DTLost 12
L#1 DoublesCAREY Corfield / Alicia Deffebach vs Jennifer Pereos / Holly Tappan0-6, 4-6
W#2 DoublesCaryn Swobe / Andrea Park vs Lisa Rutz / Christie Cooley3-6, 6-1, 1-0
L#3 DoublesKelly Sparks / Lynette van Dell vs Jennifer Bentley / Meghan Lewis6-2, 1-6, 1-0
2025-08-29vs RENO TENNIS CENTER CW8.5A-DTLost 03
L#1 DoublesLucretia Conklin / Teresa Johnston vs Christie Cooley / Angela Bader3-6, 6-7
L#2 DoublesLea Knop / Kelly Hankins vs Jenna Tempkin / Anne Inda4-6, 7-5, 0-1
L#3 DoublesJanet Peterson / Dawn Schlagel vs Holly Tappan / Debra Ziegler4-6, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Women 8.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.02 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.39
Andrea Park
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 4.5
4.33
Lucretia Conklin
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
4.32
Alicia Deffebach
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 4.5
4.17
Lynette van Dell
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
4.11
Alexis Robison
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 4.5
3.99
CAREY Corfield
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.97
Lea Knop
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
3.96
Caryn Swobe
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.87
Kelly Sparks
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
3.82
Dawn Schlagel
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.80
Lisa Dierking
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
3.52
Janet Peterson
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Jana Acri
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
Kelly Hankins
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
Teresa Johnston
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Kelly Sparks + Alexis Robison3843% games−1.7% vs expected
Alicia Deffebach + CAREY Corfield1446% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Andrea Park
11W–7L career · 5 lines in 2025
<1%78%22%
4.39
Lucretia Conklin
6W–4L career · 2 lines in 2025
1%88%11%
4.33
4.5
Alicia Deffebach
17W–10L career · 3 lines in 2025
1%89%10%
4.32
Lynette van Dell
3W–14L career · 1 line in 2025
11%88%1%
4.17
4.5
Alexis Robison
129W–46L career · 3 lines in 2025
21%79%<1%
4.11
4
CAREY Corfield
7W–10L career · type A · 3 lines in 2025
<1%54%46%
3.99
Lea Knop
2W–5L career · 2 lines in 2025
60%40%<1%
3.97
4
Caryn Swobe
3W–5L career · type A · 2 lines in 2025
<1%63%37%
3.96
Kelly Sparks
196W–127L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%83%17%
3.87
4
Dawn Schlagel
18W–7L career · 3 lines in 2025
1%89%10%
3.82
Lisa Dierking
8W–10L career · 4 lines in 2025
92%8%<1%
3.80
Janet Peterson
3W–7L career · 3 lines in 2025
>99%<1%<1%
3.52
Jana Acri
3W–3L career · 4 lines in 2025
not enough data
Kelly Hankins
3W–3L career · 4 lines in 2025
not enough data
Teresa Johnston
2W–1L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.