Teams

NNM 4.0W HP - Emmons

2023 USTA Adult 18 & Over League - NNM · 4.0 Women

15 players · average NTRP 4.00 / NORTHERN NEW MEXICO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule9 played
2023-04-23vs NNM 4.0W Lobo - DavidsonLost 14
L#1 DoublesHazel Barclay / Judy Fleischman vs Veronica Dorato / Karwyn Gustafson6-4, 3-6, 0-1
L#1 SinglesDianne Crowley vs Rachel Kennedy2-6, 7-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesSuzanne Freinberg / Barbara Emmons vs Laurie Frappier / Rae Littlewood3-6, 5-2
L#2 SinglesTracy Hartzler vs Christi Byrd1-6, 6-3, 0-1
W#3 DoublesSchoonover Jones / Wendy Thomas vs Gloria Baca / Teresa Stewart6-3, 6-1
2023-04-22vs NNM 4.0W Lobo - Brunacini JonesLost 23
L#1 DoublesHazel Barclay / Susan Beavis vs Karen Hepburn / Angelica Sabol1-6, 3-6
L#1 SinglesDianne Crowley vs Stephenie Bestawros5-7, 3-6
W#2 DoublesBarbara Emmons / Judy Fleischman vs Rhonda Letz / Michaela Haney6-4, 6-3
W#2 SinglesVirginia Hollowell vs Isabel Last6-0, 6-1
L#3 DoublesSchoonover Jones / Wendy Thomas vs Lorri Brunacini Jones / Nicole Duran Romero4-6, 6-4, 0-1
2023-04-16vs NNM 4.0W HP - JamesWon 31
W#1 DoublesHazel Barclay / Susan Beavis vs Jo Ann Erikson / Janelle Suttner7-5, 3-6, 1-0
W#1 SinglesBarbara Emmons vs Jill Suo-Anttila6-1, 6-0
L#2 DoublesSuzanne Freinberg / Schoonover Jones vs Monica Davis / Molly Cheves3-6, 3-6
W#3 DoublesJeanne Arnold / Janet Mednik vs Mary Wommack / Denise Ulibarri6-1, 6-1
2023-04-11vs NNM 4.0W NDB - SpindlerLost 12
L#1 DoublesSuzanne Freinberg / Barbara Emmons vs Karen Rice / Deanne Miller4-6, 1-6
L#1 SinglesSuzanne McGinty vs Christy Tarleton3-6, 6-4, 0-1
W#2 SinglesDianne Crowley vs Amy Stuart3-6, 6-1, 1-0
2023-04-11vs NNM 4.0W JC - Slice GirlsWon 41
W#1 DoublesBarbara Emmons / Paula Schwartz vs Darcy Odom / Jessica Spooner6-0, 7-6
L#1 SinglesSuzanne McGinty vs Mary Alice Cusentino4-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesSchoonover Jones / Janet Mednik vs Joanne Casias / Christy Miller4-6, 6-1, 1-0
W#2 SinglesDianne Crowley vs Leeanza Roybal6-0, 6-2
W#3 DoublesSusan Beavis / Virginia Hollowell vs Amanda Bien / Olivia Hon7-5, 7-5
2023-03-23vs NNM 4.0W JC - CollinsLost 23
L#1 DoublesPaula Schwartz / Suzanne McGinty vs Dina Austin / Mary McBride1-6, 1-6
L#1 SinglesDianne Crowley vs Sahreem Luergan3-6, 7-5, 0-1
L#2 DoublesSusan Beavis / Jeanne Arnold vs Tammy Collins / Ashley Fate6-3, 2-6, 1-0
W#2 SinglesVirginia Hollowell vs Christie Ross6-2, 1-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesDonna Steege / Sarah Turpie vs Lisa Sly / Michele Nelson6-4, 7-5
2023-03-19vs NNM/Nevins/18 & Over/4.0WLost 14
L#1 DoublesPaula Schwartz / Wendy Thomas vs Janet Smith / Sandra Postel2-6, 4-6
L#1 SinglesSuzanne McGinty vs Julie Cook4-6, 7-5, 0-1
L#2 DoublesDianne Crowley / Tracy Hartzler vs Melissa Clark / Melissa Morris4-6, 6-4, 0-1
L#2 SinglesDonna Steege vs Lindsey Bryant4-6, 0-6
W#3 DoublesHazel Barclay / Janet Mednik vs Jill Sanchez / Barbara Maxam2-6, 6-0, 1-0
2023-03-12vs NNM 4.0W ELG - ZiegenSplit 22
W#1 DoublesHazel Barclay / Janet Mednik vs Pauline Ziegen / Clare Maraist1-6, 6-3, 1-0
W#2 DoublesBarbara Emmons / Suzanne Freinberg vs Lisa Wynne / Kelly Cain6-4, 6-1
L#2 SinglesDianne Crowley vs Tatiana Perez4-6, 6-4, 0-1
L#3 DoublesJeanne Arnold / Susan Beavis vs Geri Romero / Karen Domenici0-6, 7-6, 0-1
2023-03-05vs NNM 4.0W TCA - RisingWon 41
W#1 DoublesJanet Mednik / Virginia Hollowell vs Jennifer Johnson / Francheska Bardacke7-6, 6-4
L#1 SinglesSuzanne McGinty vs Quiana Salazar-King4-6, 6-4, 0-1
W#2 DoublesBarbara Emmons / Suzanne Freinberg vs Jennifer White / Linda von Boetticher6-1, 6-1
W#2 SinglesDianne Crowley vs Kelly Watson6-4, 6-2
W#3 DoublesWendy Thomas / Paula Schwartz vs Rosa Cordova / Jeanne Woodfin6-2, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings10 teams · 4.0 Women
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1NNM/Nevins/18 & Over/4.0W90351028311
2NNM 4.0W NDB - Spindler81351034344
3NNM 4.0W Lobo - Brunacini Jones63232254423
4NNM 4.0W Lobo - Davidson54222354387
5NNM 4.0W TCA - Rising45222353410
6NNM 4.0W HP - Emmons45212455402
7NNM 4.0W JC - Slice Girls36172862440
8NNM 4.0W JC - Collins36162965453
9NNM 4.0W ELG - Ziegen27202555403
10NNM 4.0W HP - James18143164448

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.53 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.92
Barbara Emmons
usually #2 Doubles 57%, also #1 Doubles 29% · published 4
Donna Steege
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Singles 50% · published 4
Hazel Barclay
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published 4
3.73
Virginia Hollowell
usually #3 Doubles 40%, also #2 Singles 40% · published
3.56
Dianne Crowley
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #1 Singles 38% · published 4
3.42
Susan Beavis
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published
3.28
Suzanne McGinty
usually #1 Singles 80%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published
3.26
Sarah Turpie
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
Janet Mednik
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published
Jeanne Arnold
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Judy Fleischman
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
Paula Schwartz
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
Schoonover Jones
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
Suzanne Freinberg
usually #2 Doubles 80%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published
Tracy Hartzler
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #2 Singles 50% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Judy Fleischman + Paula Schwartz6068% games+7.1% vs expected
Hazel Barclay + Janet Mednik5554% games+4.0% vs expected
Tracy Hartzler + Dianne Crowley4257% games+4.0% vs expected
Susan Beavis + Barbara Emmons7356% games+2.7% vs expected
Janet Mednik + Susan Beavis12850% games+2.4% vs expected
Schoonover Jones + Barbara Emmons2643% games+2.2% vs expected
Virginia Hollowell + Dianne Crowley81046% games+1.6% vs expected
Suzanne Freinberg + Barbara Emmons141651% games−1.9% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Barbara Emmons
104W–71L career · 7 lines in 2023
<1%72%28%
3.92
4
Donna Steege
20W–45L career · 2 lines in 2023
not enough data
4
Hazel Barclay
37W–35L career · 5 lines in 2023
not enough data
Virginia Hollowell
92W–111L career · 5 lines in 2023
4%94%2%
3.73
4
Dianne Crowley
87W–121L career · 8 lines in 2023
32%68%<1%
3.56
Susan Beavis
83W–125L career · 5 lines in 2023
72%28%<1%
3.42
Suzanne McGinty
56W–111L career · 5 lines in 2023
2%94%4%
3.28
Sarah Turpie
45W–38L career · 3 lines in 2023
2%94%3%
3.26
Janet Mednik
29W–31L career · 5 lines in 2023
not enough data
Jeanne Arnold
16W–40L career · 3 lines in 2023
not enough data
Judy Fleischman
55W–45L career · 2 lines in 2023
not enough data
Paula Schwartz
81W–65L career · 4 lines in 2023
not enough data
Schoonover Jones
70W–71L career · 4 lines in 2023
not enough data
Suzanne Freinberg
49W–41L career · 5 lines in 2023
not enough data
Tracy Hartzler
40W–37L career · 2 lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.