Teams

CK YELLOW

2022 CTA TWILIGHT - DEN · WOMEN 4.0 - TWILIGHT

8 players · average NTRP 4.00 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2022-09-08vs CCC BLUELost 12
L#1 DoublesAnita Burns / Jaffe Biederman vs Sandra Tate / Kerri Luther6-4, 2-6, 0-1
L#1 SinglesMichelle Ziemian vs Avery Tilney3-6, 1-6
W#2 DoublesAnn Baldwin / Karol Stevens vs Valere Mathis / Kelly Weber6-4, 6-2
2022-09-06vs LEBTC YELLOWWon 21
W#1 DoublesAnita Burns / Erin Barnett vs Julie Reed / Kristine Maleri6-2, 4-6, 1-0
W#1 SinglesMichelle Ziemian vs Carla Gamet6-2, 6-1
L#2 DoublesAnn Baldwin / Janelle Coughran vs Rebecca Duque / Denise Larsen4-6, 5-7
2022-09-02vs KC BLACKWon 30
W#1 DoublesJanelle Coughran / Jaffe Biederman vs Elizabeth Pike / Kate LeClair7-5, 6-0
W#1 SinglesMichelle Ziemian vs Kristin Kottcamp6-4, 6-4
W#2 DoublesAnita Burns / Erin Barnett vs Jodi Thomas / Lauri Lehan6-4, 7-5
2022-09-01vs KC YELLOWWon 21
W#1 DoublesAnita Burns / Jaffe Biederman vs Kerry Anders / Jolein Harro6-1, 6-0
L#1 SinglesErin Barnett vs Alison Ellerbroek6-2, 1-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesAnn Baldwin / Karol Stevens vs Alana Paton / Jeanine Smith7-5, 7-5
2022-08-11vs BM GREENWon 30
W#1 DoublesJaffe Biederman / Janelle Coughran vs Carolyn Schilling / Jenny Kelly6-2, 6-3
W#1 SinglesMichelle Ziemian vs Sarah Schoeffel6-2, 6-1
W#2 DoublesAnita Burns / Danielle Matsuyama vs Julie Pontiff / Gretchen Morrison6-3, 6-3
2022-08-04vs PH ORANGEWon 21
W#1 DoublesDanielle Matsuyama / Erin Barnett vs Karen Calderone / Kennedi Pettofrezzo6-4, 6-4
W#1 SinglesMichelle Ziemian vs Arlene Cole6-0, 6-4
L#2 DoublesKarol Stevens / Ann Baldwin vs Melodie Harris / Ming Hall6-0, 4-6, 0-1
2022-07-28vs LEBTC SILVERWon 21
L#1 DoublesAnita Burns / Janelle Coughran vs Cami Hoff / Lauren Tripp6-3, 2-6, 0-1
W#1 SinglesErin Barnett vs Jazmin Smith6-3, 6-4
W#2 DoublesAnn Baldwin / Karol Stevens vs Jana Warwick / Debra Etzel6-4, 7-5
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for WOMEN 4.0 - TWILIGHT have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.68 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.85
Michelle Ziemian
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 4
3.84
Karol Stevens
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.76
Erin Barnett
usually #1 Singles 40%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 4
Danielle Matsuyama
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.70
Anita Burns
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.63
Jaffe Biederman
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.60
Janelle Coughran
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
3.39
Ann Baldwin
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Janelle Coughran + Jaffe Biederman201155% games+5.3% vs expected
Michelle Ziemian + Erin Barnett352056% games+3.8% vs expected
Erin Barnett + Anita Burns13851% games−2.1% vs expected
Ann Baldwin + Karol Stevens314 matchesnot enough data
Anita Burns + Jaffe Biederman123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Michelle Ziemian
115W–59L career · 5 lines in 2022
<1%88%12%
3.85
4
Karol Stevens
130W–55L career · 4 lines in 2022
<1%88%11%
3.84
4
Erin Barnett
91W–46L career · 5 lines in 2022
2%94%3%
3.76
4
Danielle Matsuyama
18W–14L career · 2 lines in 2022
not enough data
4
Anita Burns
70W–53L career · 6 lines in 2022
6%93%1%
3.70
4
Jaffe Biederman
27W–20L career · 4 lines in 2022
16%84%<1%
3.63
Janelle Coughran
31W–29L career · 4 lines in 2022
22%78%<1%
3.60
4
Ann Baldwin
24W–57L career · 5 lines in 2022
81%19%<1%
3.39

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.