Teams

HCC - S. Stand

2024 Hillsborough TriLevel 18 & Over · 5.0

11 players · average NTRP 4.36 / REGION_3

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2024-10-06vs Hills/Aldeen/TriLevel5.0WLost 01
L#3 DoublesRebecca Evangelista / Janel Hutchinson vs Farheen Aldeen / Kammie Bilardello3-6, 1-6
2024-09-08vs Hills/Aldeen/TriLevel5.0WWon 10
W#3 DoublesMiriam Medina Cardena - * / Irene Arias Gutierrez vs Christina Brugger / Kammie Bilardello1-6, 6-3, 1-0
2024-08-25vs Hills/Aldeen/TriLevel5.0WLost 01
L#3 DoublesElizabeth Burdick / Christina Dausch vs Farheen Aldeen / Kammie Bilardello1-6, 2-6
2024-08-20vs Hills/Aldeen/TriLevel5.0WWon 10
W#3 DoublesElizabeth Burdick / Christina Dausch vs Farheen Aldeen / Christina Brugger6-3, 6-3
2024-08-17vs Hills/Aldeen/TriLevel5.0WLost 01
L#3 DoublesChristina Dausch / Irene Arias Gutierrez vs Angie Jones / Kammie Bilardello5-7, 5-7
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 5.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.13 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.96
Bec Bruning
published 5
Aly Peterson
published 5
4.34
Stephanie Means
published
4.27
Maria Stand
published
Asbel Giang
published 4.5
4.11
3.92
Rebecca Evangelista
usually #2 Doubles 83%, also #3 Doubles 17% · published 4
3.85
Irene Arias Gutierrez
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 22% · published 4
3.82
Christina Dausch
usually #3 Doubles 43%, also #1 Doubles 29% · published 4
3.79
Elizabeth Burdick
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 4
Madison Stephens
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Elizabeth Burdick + Christina Dausch15952% games−5.4% vs expected
Rebecca Evangelista + Irene Arias Gutierrez314 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

5
Bec Bruning
3W–2L career · no lines in 2024
no projection at this level
4.96
5
Aly Peterson
2W–0L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Stephanie Means
13W–5L career · no lines in 2024
1%87%12%
4.34
Maria Stand
6W–3L career · no lines in 2024
3%92%5%
4.27
4.5
Asbel Giang
7W–0L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Miriam Medina Cardena
3W–1L career · no lines in 2024
22%78%<1%
4.11
4
Rebecca Evangelista
113W–52L career · 6 lines in 2024
<1%71%28%
3.92
4
Irene Arias Gutierrez
65W–63L career · 9 lines in 2024
1%85%15%
3.85
4
Christina Dausch
180W–109L career · 7 lines in 2024
1%89%10%
3.82
4
Elizabeth Burdick
222W–79L career · 3 lines in 2024
2%92%6%
3.79
Madison Stephens
1W–1L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.