Teams

Hills/Aldeen/TriLevel5.0W

2024 Hillsborough TriLevel 18 & Over · 5.0

10 players · average NTRP 4.50 / REGION_3

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2024-10-06Won 10
W#2 DoublesKatrina Duquemin / Elizabeth Rodgers vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2024-09-26vs HCC - S. StandLost 01
L#2 DoublesKatrina Duquemin / Maki Smith vs Bec Bruning / Asbel Giang5-7, 6-4, 0-1
2024-09-08vs HCC - S. StandLost 01
L#3 DoublesChristina Brugger / Kammie Bilardello vs Miriam Medina Cardena - * / Irene Arias Gutierrez6-1, 3-6, 0-1
2024-08-25vs HCC - S. StandWon 10
W#1 DoublesBeatrice Few / Natalie Paiva vs Madison Stephens / Teal Henderson6-2, 6-1
2024-08-20vs HCC - S. StandLost 12
W#1 DoublesBeatrice Few / Natalie Paiva vs Teal Henderson / Sarah Summerfield Lytle6-2, 6-3
L#2 DoublesKatrina Duquemin / Maki Smith vs Emily Hewland / Madison Stephens0-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesFarheen Aldeen / Christina Brugger vs Elizabeth Burdick / Christina Dausch3-6, 3-6
2024-08-17vs HCC - S. StandWon 20
W#1 DoublesNatalie Paiva / Elizabeth Baldwin vs Aly Peterson / Sarah Summerfield Lytle6-3, 6-3
W#2 DoublesKatrina Duquemin / Maki Smith vs Madison Stephens / Emily Hewland3-6, 6-2, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 5.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.35 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.80
Natalie Paiva
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
4.50
Elizabeth Baldwin
published
4.42
Elizabeth Rodgers
published
4.39
Katrina Duquemin
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
4.39
Angie Jones
published 4.5
4.37
Lisa Ross
published
4.22
Rikke Kemp
published
4.18
Christina Brugger
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
4.17
Farheen Aldeen
published
4.07
Maki Smith
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Lisa Ross + Elizabeth Rodgers6257% games+2.7% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Natalie Paiva
22W–20L career · 3 lines in 2024
no projection at this level
4.80
Elizabeth Baldwin
2W–8L career · no lines in 2024
no projection at this level
4.50
Elizabeth Rodgers
6W–2L career · no lines in 2024
<1%71%28%
4.42
Katrina Duquemin
32W–11L career · 4 lines in 2024
<1%78%22%
4.39
4.5
Angie Jones
11W–7L career · no lines in 2024
<1%79%21%
4.39
Lisa Ross
6W–2L career · no lines in 2024
<1%83%17%
4.37
Rikke Kemp
1W–5L career · no lines in 2024
6%92%2%
4.22
4.5
Christina Brugger
145W–93L career · 2 lines in 2024
9%89%1%
4.18
Farheen Aldeen
5W–3L career · no lines in 2024
12%88%1%
4.17
Maki Smith
4W–1L career · no lines in 2024
31%69%<1%
4.07

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.