Teams

KY/OWB/BOSWELL/RICHESON

2022 USTA ADULT 55 & OVER REGIONAL · 3.5 Women

6 players · average NTRP 3.50 / KENTUCKY

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
2022-03-06vs KY/BG/VILINESLost 02
L#1 DoublesFrancie Watts / Julie Flittner vs Kathleen St Clair / Vivian Schlinke1-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesCarrie Boswell / Linda Richeson vs Beverly Cummins / Linda Seagle1-6, 4-6
2022-03-06vs KY/PAD/SCHIFFLost 03
L#1 DoublesLinda Richeson / Carrie Boswell vs Sarah House / Sharon White2-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesHeloise Westbrook / Francie Watts vs Karen Falder / Priscilla Schiff0-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesCindy Thompson / Christie Anderson vs Donna Almand / Janie Forbis2-6, 0-6
2022-03-05vs KY/BG/VILINESLost 03
L#1 DoublesLinda Richeson / Julie Flittner vs Gaye Flener / Elaine Vilines3-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesCindy Thompson / Christie Anderson vs Kathleen St Clair / Linda Seagle3-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesHeloise Westbrook / Francie Watts vs Vivian Schlinke / Beverly Cummins1-6, 5-7
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.26 estimated across 2 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.38
Julie Flittner
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Carrie Boswell
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
Christie Anderson
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
Francie Watts
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.15
Linda Richeson
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Heloise Westbrook
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Carrie Boswell + Linda Richeson4643% games−1.8% vs expected
Francie Watts + Heloise Westbrook033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Julie Flittner
130W–101L career · 2 lines in 2022
<1%83%17%
3.38
3.5
Carrie Boswell
4W–10L career · 2 lines in 2022
not enough data
3.5
Christie Anderson
0W–5L career · 2 lines in 2022
not enough data
3.5
Francie Watts
0W–12L career · 3 lines in 2022
not enough data
Linda Richeson
6W–12L career · 3 lines in 2022
12%87%<1%
3.15
Heloise Westbrook
0W–3L career · 2 lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.