Teams

KY/BG/VILINES

2022 USTA ADULT 55 & OVER REGIONAL · 3.5 Women

8 players · average NTRP 3.50 / KENTUCKY

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2022-03-06vs KY/OWB/BOSWELL/RICHESONWon 20
W#1 DoublesKathleen St Clair / Vivian Schlinke vs Francie Watts / Julie Flittner6-1, 6-2
W#2 DoublesBeverly Cummins / Linda Seagle vs Carrie Boswell / Linda Richeson6-1, 6-4
2022-03-06vs KY/OWB/KIRKLANDWon 21
L#1 DoublesLinda Pillow / Elaine Vilines vs Melissa Burlew / Kristen Rackliffe1-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesKathleen St Clair / Gay Suiter vs Peggy Belt / Beverly Nation6-2, 6-2
W#3 DoublesBeverly Cummins / Linda Seagle vs Mary Miller / Kathy Donley6-3, 6-3
2022-03-05vs KY/PAD/SCHIFFLost 03
L#1 DoublesGaye Flener / Linda Pillow vs Sarah House / Signe Clayton3-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesVivian Schlinke / Linda Seagle vs Yvette Brehm / Priscilla Schiff1-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesKathleen St Clair / Gay Suiter vs Donna Almand / Sharon White0-6, 6-1, 1-0
2022-03-05vs KY/OWB/BOSWELL/RICHESONWon 30
W#1 DoublesGaye Flener / Elaine Vilines vs Linda Richeson / Julie Flittner6-3, 6-2
W#2 DoublesKathleen St Clair / Linda Seagle vs Cindy Thompson / Christie Anderson6-3, 6-1
W#3 DoublesVivian Schlinke / Beverly Cummins vs Heloise Westbrook / Francie Watts6-1, 7-5
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.11 estimated across 2 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Gaye Flener
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.14
Gay Suiter
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.08
Elaine Vilines
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
Beverly Cummins
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Kathleen St Clair
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
Linda Pillow
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Linda Seagle
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
Vivian Schlinke
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Gaye Flener
3W–5L career · type A · 2 lines in 2022
not enough data
3.5
Gay Suiter
18W–18L career · 2 lines in 2022
14%85%<1%
3.14
3.5
Elaine Vilines
4W–14L career · 3 lines in 2022
27%73%<1%
3.08
Beverly Cummins
3W–0L career · 3 lines in 2022
not enough data
Kathleen St Clair
4W–4L career · 4 lines in 2022
not enough data
Linda Pillow
0W–2L career · 2 lines in 2022
not enough data
Linda Seagle
3W–1L career · 4 lines in 2022
not enough data
Vivian Schlinke
2W–1L career · 3 lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.