Teams

Phillips/Nashville

2025 Adult 18 & Over - Early Start League-Nashville · 3.0 Women - Monday AM

15 players · average NTRP 3.00 / TENNESSEE

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2024-11-15vs Babu/NashvilleLost 01
L#3 DoublesJacqueline Phillips / Kim Bright vs Laurie Dobbs / Melinda Senna6-7, 5-7
2024-10-25vs Vogel/Wood/NashvilleLost 01
L#3 DoublesKim Bright / Debbie Militante vs Sarah Vogel / Paige Adair2-6, 2-6
2024-10-21vs Coggin/NashvilleWon 31
W#1 DoublesLynley McCarley / Kim Bright vs Lori Breaux / Stephanie Brasili6-3, 6-3
L#1 SinglesMartha Galyon vs Sarah Schmidt1-6, 6-2, 1-0
W#2 DoublesLaurie Farris / Nancy King vs Mary Pat Davis / Rumiko Sikes6-0, 6-2
W#3 DoublesJulie May / Glenda Anderson vs Kristan Schiedemeyer / Reagan Yount6-1, 6-1
2024-10-04vs Balint/NashvilleWon 10
W#3 DoublesJacqueline Phillips / Meredith Hollomon vs Cindy Funck / Fran McConnell6-2, 6-3
2024-09-30vs Dyer/Estes/NashvilleWon 41
W#1 DoublesJacqueline Phillips / Meredith Hollomon vs Claire Contaldo / McClain Franks6-2, 6-2
L#1 SinglesJamie Vaughan vs Jamie Walker6-1, 1-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesKimberly O'Malley / Debbie Militante vs Angie Simmons / Lindsay Landman6-4, 6-1
W#2 SinglesMartha Galyon vs Lindsey Burroughs6-1, 6-1
W#3 DoublesLynley McCarley / Elaine Lee vs Brittany Hammrich / Casey Dyer7-5, 7-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.0 Women - Monday AM have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.76 estimated across 14 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.95
Kim Bright
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
2.93
Nancy King
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.85
Jacqueline Phillips
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
2.84
Meredith Hollomon
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
2.79
Debbie Militante
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.77
Martha Galyon
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published
2.77
Wendy Baker
published
2.76
Laurie Farris
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.70
Angela Robbins
published 3
2.70
Kimberly O'Malley
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.69
Glenda Anderson
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.63
Jamie Vaughan
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
2.62
Jennifer Freeland
published
2.60
Heather Elder
published
Lynley McCarley
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Meredith Hollomon + Jacqueline Phillips8649% games+2.6% vs expected
Angela Robbins + Wendy Baker224 matchesnot enough data
Laurie Farris + Kim Bright033 matchesnot enough data
Kim Bright + Nancy King213 matchesnot enough data
Kim Bright + Wendy Baker213 matchesnot enough data
Jamie Vaughan + Glenda Anderson303 matchesnot enough data
Debbie Militante + Heather Elder033 matchesnot enough data
Debbie Militante + Kimberly O'Malley213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Kim Bright
14W–25L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%63%37%
2.95
Nancy King
14W–6L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%69%31%
2.93
Jacqueline Phillips
13W–11L career · 3 lines in 2025
1%85%15%
2.85
Meredith Hollomon
10W–12L career · 2 lines in 2025
1%87%12%
2.84
3
Debbie Militante
10W–12L career · 2 lines in 2025
2%91%7%
2.79
Martha Galyon
4W–7L career · 2 lines in 2025
3%92%5%
2.77
Wendy Baker
16W–14L career · no lines in 2025
3%92%5%
2.77
Laurie Farris
4W–11L career · 1 line in 2025
3%92%4%
2.76
3
Angela Robbins
6W–8L career · no lines in 2025
8%91%2%
2.70
Kimberly O'Malley
8W–6L career · 1 line in 2025
8%90%1%
2.70
Glenda Anderson
11W–13L career · 1 line in 2025
9%90%1%
2.69
Jamie Vaughan
5W–10L career · 1 line in 2025
17%82%<1%
2.63
Jennifer Freeland
8W–10L career · no lines in 2025
21%79%<1%
2.62
Heather Elder
3W–6L career · no lines in 2025
23%76%<1%
2.60
Lynley McCarley
2W–0L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.