Teams

Balint/Nashville

2025 Adult 18 & Over - Early Start League-Nashville · 3.5 Women - FRI AM

18 players · average NTRP 3.20 / TENNESSEE

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2024-12-09vs Powers/Collins/NashvilleLost 04
L#1 DoublesSheila Ekedahl / Sherri Jones vs Nicole Keenan / Brandi White7-6, 4-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesAimee Lawson / Kim Justice vs Christie Harrison / Jennifer Comegna3-6, 3-6
L#2 SinglesNora Balint vs Erica Collins0-6, 0-6
L#3 DoublesCindy Funck / Michele Wolfson vs Mary Powers / Judith Gallagher3-6, 3-6
2024-11-08vs Babu/NashvilleLost 14
L#1 DoublesCathy-Jo Elwood / Deena Ottinger vs Laurie Dobbs / Kate Tharp4-6, 3-6
L#1 SinglesRenee Henry vs Katie Ouellette4-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesNora Balint / Sheila Ekedahl vs Ally Bateman / Jaclyn Carney1-6, 3-6
W#2 SinglesAimee Lawson vs Rachel Oliver6-2, 6-0
L#3 DoublesMichele Wolfson / Renee Atkins vs Nicole Babu / Cristin Hambidge3-6, 2-6
2024-10-23vs Vogel/Wood/NashvilleLost 14
L#1 DoublesMagdalena Santelices / Kim Justice vs Ali Davis / Morgan Hinkley4-6, 0-6
L#1 SinglesAngela Brassfield vs Casey Parker0-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesCathy-Jo Elwood / Deena Ottinger vs Lacey Keally / Stacey Wood1-6, 3-6
W#2 SinglesRenee Henry vs Julie Wilson3-6, 7-5, 1-0
L#3 DoublesCindy Funck / Sherri Jones vs Sarah Vogel / Paige Adair2-6, 4-6
2024-10-04vs Phillips/NashvilleLost 14
L#1 DoublesCassie Luckinbill / Renee Henry vs Kara Kolstad / Trish James3-6, 7-6, 0-1
L#1 SinglesAimee Lawson vs Laurie Hooper1-6, 1-6
W#2 DoublesNora Balint / Renee Atkins vs Kim West / Susan Zieman6-3, 6-4
L#2 SinglesMagdalena Santelices vs Joelle Speed1-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesCindy Funck / Fran McConnell vs Jacqueline Phillips / Meredith Hollomon2-6, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.5 Women - FRI AM have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.87 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Deena Ottinger
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.15
Aimee Lawson
usually #2 Singles 33%, also #1 Singles 33% · published 3
3.14
Cassie Luckinbill
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.12
Nora Balint
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #2 Singles 33% · published
3.02
Sheila Ekedahl
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
2.89
Jennifer Spoletini
published
2.84
Renee Henry
usually #1 Singles 40%, also #2 Singles 40% · published
2.80
Sherri Jones
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published
Cindy Funck
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.72
Cathy-Jo Elwood
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.72
Renee Atkins
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
2.58
Larissa Rufener
published
2.54
Kelly Reedy
published
Angela Brassfield
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
Fran McConnell
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Kim Justice
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
Magdalena Santelices
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
Michele Wolfson
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Nora Balint + Sheila Ekedahl2340% games−12.1% vs expected
Jennifer Spoletini + Aimee Lawson134 matchesnot enough data
Jennifer Spoletini + Cathy-Jo Elwood044 matchesnot enough data
Sherri Jones + Renee Atkins224 matchesnot enough data
Deena Ottinger + Cathy-Jo Elwood033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Deena Ottinger
0W–3L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
3
Aimee Lawson
21W–10L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%14%86%
3.15
3.5
Cassie Luckinbill
2W–9L career · 1 line in 2025
16%84%1%
3.14
Nora Balint
4W–5L career · 3 lines in 2025
20%80%<1%
3.12
Sheila Ekedahl
3W–7L career · 2 lines in 2025
44%56%<1%
3.02
Jennifer Spoletini
10W–28L career · no lines in 2025
<1%78%22%
2.89
Renee Henry
8W–4L career · 5 lines in 2025
1%87%13%
2.84
Sherri Jones
14W–10L career · 5 lines in 2025
1%90%8%
2.80
3
Cindy Funck
0W–4L career · 4 lines in 2025
not enough data
3
Cathy-Jo Elwood
0W–12L career · 2 lines in 2025
6%92%2%
2.72
Renee Atkins
10W–9L career · 3 lines in 2025
6%92%2%
2.72
Larissa Rufener
1W–4L career · no lines in 2025
27%72%<1%
2.58
Kelly Reedy
1W–2L career · no lines in 2025
38%62%<1%
2.54
Angela Brassfield
0W–1L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Fran McConnell
0W–1L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Kim Justice
2W–3L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
Magdalena Santelices
0W–4L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
Michele Wolfson
1W–2L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.