Teams

Powers/Collins/Nashville

2025 Adult 18 & Over - Early Start League-Nashville · 3.5 Women - FRI AM

17 players · average NTRP 3.50 / TENNESSEE

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2024-12-09vs Balint/NashvilleWon 40
W#1 DoublesNicole Keenan / Brandi White vs Sheila Ekedahl / Sherri Jones6-7, 6-4, 1-0
W#2 DoublesChristie Harrison / Jennifer Comegna vs Aimee Lawson / Kim Justice6-3, 6-3
W#2 SinglesErica Collins vs Nora Balint6-0, 6-0
W#3 DoublesMary Powers / Judith Gallagher vs Cindy Funck / Michele Wolfson6-3, 6-3
2024-11-01vs Babu/NashvilleWon 32
L#1 DoublesAnjali Lewis / Kathy Wells vs Nicole Babu / Cristin Hambidge2-6, 4-6
W#1 SinglesBeth Gottlieb vs Catherine Felton2-6, 7-5, 1-0
L#2 DoublesJennifer Comegna / Sarah MacIntyre vs Lissa Jarnigan / Kristin Barlowe2-6, 3-6
W#2 SinglesErica Collins vs Katie Ouellette6-2, 6-3
W#3 DoublesHolly Baumgartner / Jill Byrum vs Laurie Dobbs / Jaclyn Carney6-2, 6-4
2024-10-18vs Venable/NashvilleLost 14
L#1 DoublesHolly Baumgartner / Jill Byrum vs Kim Venable / Wendi Miller6-7, 7-6, 0-1
L#1 SinglesBeth Gottlieb vs Annabella Lodge6-4, 4-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesBrandi White / Jennifer Comegna vs Rene Fields / Liz Grabarits2-6, 1-6
L#2 SinglesDina Sjursen vs Jenifer Lodge1-6, 0-6
W#3 DoublesAnjali Lewis / Ashley Snipes vs Corinne Perry / Teresa Hamilton6-4, 6-2
2024-10-04vs Vogel/Wood/NashvilleLost 23
L#1 DoublesAnjali Lewis / Nicki Robins vs Sarah Vogel / Ali Davis3-6, 1-6
W#1 SinglesChristie Harrison vs Victoria Lubnik6-2, 6-2
L#2 DoublesDina Sjursen / Ashley Snipes vs Stacey Wood / Lacey Keally3-6, 1-6
W#2 SinglesBeth Gottlieb vs Brooke Keane7-5, 6-1
L#3 DoublesHolly Baumgartner / Jennifer Comegna vs Morgan Hinkley / Paige Adair3-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.5 Women - FRI AM have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.15 estimated across 17 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.66
Christie Harrison
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published 4
3.57
Erica Collins
usually #2 Singles 60%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published
3.39
Nicole Keenan
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.29
Nicki Robins
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
3.24
Beth Gottlieb
usually #1 Singles 57%, also #1 Doubles 14% · published 3.5
3.23
Kathy Wells
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.22
Anjali Lewis
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.20
Ashley Snipes
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published 3.5
3.17
Sarah MacIntyre
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
3.11
Jill Byrum
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published
3.09
Mary Powers
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
3.07
Holly Baumgartner
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
3.04
Wendy Farley
published
2.96
Ivy Dodson
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #2 Singles 33% · published
2.91
Brandi White
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.81
Dina Sjursen
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
2.64
Jennifer Comegna
usually #2 Doubles 63%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Holly Baumgartner + Erica Collins1541% games−2.3% vs expected
Sarah MacIntyre + Jill Byrum2352% games−6.9% vs expected
Dina Sjursen + Jennifer Comegna3642% games−8.7% vs expected
Dina Sjursen + Jill Byrum224 matchesnot enough data
Jennifer Comegna + Nicki Robins044 matchesnot enough data
Jennifer Comegna + Jill Byrum134 matchesnot enough data
Holly Baumgartner + Jill Byrum224 matchesnot enough data
Kathy Wells + Jill Byrum224 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Christie Harrison
33W–13L career · 2 lines in 2025
12%87%1%
3.66
Erica Collins
30W–25L career · 5 lines in 2025
<1%30%70%
3.57
Nicole Keenan
19W–11L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%78%21%
3.39
Nicki Robins
13W–13L career · 3 lines in 2025
2%92%6%
3.29
3.5
Beth Gottlieb
16W–27L career · 7 lines in 2025
4%92%3%
3.24
Kathy Wells
6W–10L career · 3 lines in 2025
5%92%3%
3.23
3.5
Anjali Lewis
18W–28L career · 6 lines in 2025
6%92%2%
3.22
3.5
Ashley Snipes
10W–19L career · 5 lines in 2025
8%91%2%
3.20
Sarah MacIntyre
8W–19L career · 2 lines in 2025
12%88%1%
3.17
Jill Byrum
14W–23L career · 5 lines in 2025
22%78%<1%
3.11
Mary Powers
3W–12L career · 3 lines in 2025
>99%<1%<1%
3.09
Holly Baumgartner
10W–36L career · 6 lines in 2025
31%69%<1%
3.07
Wendy Farley
14W–15L career · no lines in 2025
<1%38%62%
3.04
Ivy Dodson
11W–13L career · 3 lines in 2025
61%39%<1%
2.96
3
Brandi White
5W–12L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%73%27%
2.91
Dina Sjursen
13W–29L career · 6 lines in 2025
1%89%9%
2.81
Jennifer Comegna
13W–35L career · 8 lines in 2025
15%84%1%
2.64

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.