Teams

OLYMPIC CW8.5A

2023 COMBO · Women 8.5

19 players · average NTRP 4.40 / NO. CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Flight standings for Women 8.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.99 estimated across 14 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.25
Clare Badaracco
published 4.5
4.18
Zeynep Chasseray
published
4.16
Allison Watts
published 4.5
4.16
Caitlin Beatty
published 4.5
4.10
Victoria Watts
published
4.08
Carolina O'Haren
published 4.5
4.03
Valerie Pietrasz
published
4.01
Lisa Lohre
published
4.01
Jennifer Dibble
published
3.99
Karla Lovett
published
3.97
Katherine McCracken
published
3.80
3.57
Marie Allman
published
3.53
Tricia Weaver-Moss
published
Harriet Fryman
published
Karen MacK
published
Kayla Emmerson
published
Nicole Wedlake
published
Sherry LaPorte
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Lisa Lohre + Caitlin Beatty9653% games+1.3% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Clare Badaracco
5W–6L career · no lines in 2023
4%93%4%
4.25
Zeynep Chasseray
4W–4L career · no lines in 2023
10%89%1%
4.18
4.5
Allison Watts
2W–1L career · no lines in 2023
13%87%1%
4.16
4.5
Caitlin Beatty
13W–7L career · no lines in 2023
13%86%1%
4.16
Victoria Watts
2W–1L career · no lines in 2023
24%76%<1%
4.10
4.5
Carolina O'Haren
1W–3L career · no lines in 2023
29%71%<1%
4.08
Valerie Pietrasz
10W–7L career · no lines in 2023
41%59%<1%
4.03
Lisa Lohre
9W–10L career · no lines in 2023
46%54%<1%
4.01
Jennifer Dibble
4W–3L career · no lines in 2023
47%53%<1%
4.01
Karla Lovett
0W–9L career · no lines in 2023
54%46%<1%
3.99
Katherine McCracken
3W–3L career · no lines in 2023
59%41%<1%
3.97
4
Catherine Fogelman
20W–7L career · no lines in 2023
1%90%8%
3.80
Marie Allman
4W–7L career · no lines in 2023
30%70%<1%
3.57
Tricia Weaver-Moss
3W–7L career · no lines in 2023
41%59%<1%
3.53
Harriet Fryman
0W–4L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Karen MacK
0W–2L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Kayla Emmerson
0W–1L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Nicole Wedlake
1W–1L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Sherry LaPorte
0W–3L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.