Teams

WALNUT CREEK RC/Walnut Creek TC 40AW3.5C

2025 ADULT 40&Over · Women's 3.5

20 players · average NTRP 3.50 / NO. CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2025-03-16vs CHABOT CANYON 40AW3.5AWon 10
W#1 SinglesTheresa Goodwin vs Christina Stearns6-4, 5-7, 1-0
2025-03-11vs MORAGA CC 40AW3.5ALost 01
L#3 DoublesLani Aurelius / Julia Petrov vs Jill Hudson / Erin Ackdoe2-6, 4-6
2025-03-09vs BAY CLUB PL 40AW3.5AWon 10
W#2 DoublesMiwon Vella / Lani Aurelius vs Michelle Hu / Tina Zhao6-2, 4-6, 1-0
2025-02-09vs ST MARY 40AW3.5AWon 10
W#1 DoublesLani Aurelius / Courtney Bock vs Kathy Simon / Zora Voss6-1, 5-7, 1-0
W#2 DoublesRobyn Schleifman / Cindy Turner vs Kathlyn Powers / Julia Petrov6-1, 6-2
2025-01-25vs DIAMOND HILLS 40AW3.5ALost 01
L#3 DoublesMarjan Gholamalipour / Lani Aurelius vs Christina Dalton / Desiree Barnes6-3, 2-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesLani Aurelius / Rosanne Kim vs Miwon Vella / Lori Guariento6-3, 6-2
2025-01-12vs FREMONT TC 40AW3.5ALost 01
L#2 DoublesLisa Saporito / Lani Aurelius vs Kathy Mertens / Mai Pham6-7, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Women's 3.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.28 estimated across 19 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.67
Theresa Goodwin
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
3.49
Diana Babayan
published 3.5
3.39
Rosanne Kim
published
3.37
Nga Gross
published
3.36
Cindy Turner
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.35
Becky Reiss
published 3.5
3.35
Jennifer Caruso
published
3.35
Kathleen Pruden
published
3.29
Tammie Snyder
published
3.27
Lani Aurelius
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
3.27
Stephanie Law
published
3.24
Courtney Bock
published 3.5
3.24
Julia Petrov
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.21
Pamela Maloney
published
3.12
Hazel Indick
published
3.11
Karen Treppa
published
3.10
Jennifer Scriabine
published
3.10
2.99
Catherine Sampietro
published 3.5
Sally Krapf
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Karen Treppa + Lani Aurelius4351% games+3.9% vs expected
Jennifer Caruso + Cindy Turner303 matchesnot enough data
Lani Aurelius + Tammie Snyder123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Theresa Goodwin
61W–21L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%11%89%
3.67
3.5
Diana Babayan
27W–22L career · no lines in 2025
<1%53%47%
3.49
Rosanne Kim
12W–6L career · no lines in 2025
<1%79%21%
3.39
Nga Gross
17W–24L career · no lines in 2025
<1%81%18%
3.37
3.5
Cindy Turner
20W–5L career · 1 line in 2025
1%84%16%
3.36
3.5
Becky Reiss
12W–7L career · no lines in 2025
1%85%15%
3.35
Jennifer Caruso
15W–11L career · no lines in 2025
1%85%14%
3.35
Kathleen Pruden
12W–14L career · no lines in 2025
1%86%13%
3.35
Tammie Snyder
24W–15L career · no lines in 2025
2%91%7%
3.29
Lani Aurelius
187W–146L career · 6 lines in 2025
2%92%5%
3.27
Stephanie Law
14W–26L career · no lines in 2025
3%92%5%
3.27
3.5
Courtney Bock
23W–22L career · no lines in 2025
4%93%3%
3.24
Julia Petrov
11W–10L career · 1 line in 2025
4%92%3%
3.24
Pamela Maloney
9W–8L career · no lines in 2025
7%91%2%
3.21
Hazel Indick
18W–15L career · no lines in 2025
20%80%<1%
3.12
Karen Treppa
17W–16L career · no lines in 2025
21%78%<1%
3.11
Jennifer Scriabine
0W–7L career · no lines in 2025
23%76%<1%
3.10
Marjan Gholamalipour
10W–6L career · no lines in 2025
<1%24%76%
3.10
3.5
Catherine Sampietro
3W–12L career · no lines in 2025
52%48%<1%
2.99
Sally Krapf
1W–1L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.