Teams

Pattabiraman, Karthick

2023 Adult 18 & Over Winter 2.5W - 5.0 & Open · 3.5 Men

12 players · average NTRP 3.62 / HEART OF AMERICA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2022-12-03vs Rayl, DavidWon 30
W#1 DoublesDalton Link / Ricardo Mattos vs David Bundy / David Rayl3-6, 7-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesJay Caple / Brett Saunders vs Chris Lyon / John Malarky6-1, 6-3
W#3 DoublesTimothy Moyer / Chad Weston vs Ronald Jones / Michael Roane6-3, 7-6
2022-11-19vs Bicknell, BradLost 12
L#1 DoublesRicardo Mattos / Jeffrey Asbell vs Tobby Cheruthuruthil / Kevin Phillips4-6, 5-7
W#2 DoublesChad Weston / Brett Saunders vs Jeff Nelson / Bek Abdullayev3-6, 7-5, 1-0
L#3 DoublesMark Davenport / Mike Holm vs Andrew Wimmer / Eric Wimmer4-6, 5-7
2022-11-12vs Snyder, PaulWon 21
W#1 DoublesDalton Link / Jay Caple vs Tom Robison / John Schlueter6-1, 6-4
L#2 DoublesRicardo Mattos / Tom Fangman vs Dustin Deisher / Robert Tanenbaum5-7, 4-6
W#3 DoublesChad Weston / Timothy Moyer vs Salih Samo / Paul Snyder7-6, 6-1
2022-10-29vs Dauer, JimLost 03
L#1 DoublesDalton Link / Mike Holm vs Ronald Chen / Jim Dauer1-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesDavid Keefer / Jeffrey Asbell vs Brad Cook / Yijia Liu0-6, 0-6
L#3 DoublesJay Caple / Timothy Moyer vs Andrew Reed / Scott Oppliger2-6, 6-3, 1-0
2022-10-22vs Wohlers, CharlesWon 21
W#1 DoublesJay Caple / Brett Saunders vs Mark McDonald / Tim Grier7-5, 6-1
W#2 DoublesJeffrey Asbell / Mark Davenport vs Randall Jensen / John Evatt7-6, 3-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesDavid Keefer / Tom Fangman vs Charles Davis / Charles Wohlers3-6, 2-6
2022-10-15vs Madhira, UmaLost 03
L#1 DoublesJeffrey Asbell / Timothy Moyer vs Brian Schwermann / Tony Prettejohn4-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesMike Holm / Ricardo Mattos vs Joshua Moreland / Juergen Massey4-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesKarthick Pattabiraman / Chad Weston vs Josh Klingler / Kantha Kanchiraju2-6, 1-6
2022-10-08vs Granger, NathanWon 21
L#1 DoublesJay Caple / Brett Saunders vs David Coleman / Jeff Eskew6-7, 2-6
W#2 DoublesDalton Link / Chad Weston vs Tim Askew / Jeremy Zwillenberg6-2, 6-4
W#3 DoublesMark Davenport / Tom Fangman vs Kowin Casey / ANDRE CURIEL5-7, 6-3, 1-0
2022-10-01vs Stachnik, JustinWon 21
W#1 DoublesBrett Saunders / Jay Caple vs Thomas Davis / Steven Gibbons6-3, 6-1
L#2 DoublesTom Fangman / David Keefer vs Jerry Larson / Michael PAHR3-6, 6-1, 0-1
W#3 DoublesRicardo Mattos / Mark Davenport vs David Harrison / Pat Leopold6-2, 6-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.5 Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.39 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.75
Jay Caple
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 17% · published
3.53
Dalton Link
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.48
Brett Saunders
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
3.34
Karthick Pattabiraman
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.26
Jeffrey Asbell
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
David Keefer
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.22
Chad Weston
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
3.18
Mike Holm
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
Mark Davenport
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
Ricardo Mattos
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published
Timothy Moyer
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
Tom Fangman
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Brett Saunders + Jay Caple6553% games+11.3% vs expected
Jay Caple + Dalton Link2346% gamesnot enough data
Brett Saunders + Dalton Link314 matchesnot enough data
Karthick Pattabiraman + Chad Weston213 matchesnot enough data
Mike Holm + Tom Fangman123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Jay Caple
46W–38L career · 6 lines in 2023
3%95%3%
3.75
4
Dalton Link
16W–8L career · 4 lines in 2023
41%59%<1%
3.53
3.5
Brett Saunders
56W–45L career · 5 lines in 2023
<1%57%43%
3.48
Karthick Pattabiraman
19W–21L career · 1 line in 2023
<1%89%11%
3.34
Jeffrey Asbell
34W–48L career · 4 lines in 2023
2%94%3%
3.26
3.5
David Keefer
6W–7L career · 3 lines in 2023
not enough data
3.5
Chad Weston
24W–34L career · 5 lines in 2023
4%94%2%
3.22
Mike Holm
20W–24L career · 3 lines in 2023
8%91%1%
3.18
Mark Davenport
20W–14L career · 4 lines in 2023
not enough data
Ricardo Mattos
9W–9L career · 5 lines in 2023
not enough data
Timothy Moyer
7W–18L career · 4 lines in 2023
not enough data
Tom Fangman
2W–16L career · 4 lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.