Teams

Dauer, Jim

2023 Adult 18 & Over Winter 2.5W - 5.0 & Open · 3.5 Men

13 players · average NTRP 3.71 / HEART OF AMERICA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2022-12-03vs Stachnik, JustinWon 30
W#1 DoublesJim Dauer / Danny Dumit vs Michael PAHR / Chris Wilson6-3, 6-2
W#2 DoublesAndrew Reed / Bryan Zingg vs Martin Thornton / Luke Hansen6-1, 6-0
W#3 DoublesNate Anderson / Chan Kim vs Jerry Larson / Thomas Davis6-3, 6-0
2022-11-19Won 21
W#1 DoublesRonald Chen / Jim Dauer vs Peter Kalinowski / Michael Roane6-1, 6-1
W#2 DoublesAndrew Reed / Scott Oppliger vs David Bundy / Chris Rayl6-0, 7-5
L#3 DoublesDanny Dumit / Nate Anderson vs Chris Lyon / David Rayl3-6, 6-4, 0-1
2022-11-12vs Bicknell, BradLost 12
W#1 DoublesPierce Baldus / Andrew Reed vs Jonathan Kline / Charlie Murphy7-6, 6-4
L#2 DoublesBrad Cook / Alex Che vs Brad Bicknell / Curtis Bicknell6-1, 5-7, 0-1
L#3 DoublesDanny Dumit / Chan Kim vs Andrew Wimmer / Eric Wimmer2-6, 2-6
2022-11-05vs Snyder, PaulWon 21
L#1 DoublesChris Long / Danny Dumit vs Richard Bierman / Matt Moore2-6, 7-5, 0-1
W#2 DoublesRobert Madison / Chan Kim vs Narasimha Vanipenta / Dustin Deisher2-6, 6-2, 1-0
W#3 DoublesScott Oppliger / Bryan Zingg vs Paul Snyder / Martin Rankin6-2, 7-5
2022-10-29vs Pattabiraman, KarthickWon 30
W#1 DoublesRonald Chen / Jim Dauer vs Dalton Link / Mike Holm6-1, 6-3
W#2 DoublesBrad Cook / Yijia Liu vs David Keefer / Jeffrey Asbell6-0, 6-0
W#3 DoublesAndrew Reed / Scott Oppliger vs Jay Caple / Timothy Moyer2-6, 6-3, 1-0
2022-10-15vs Wohlers, CharlesWon 21
W#1 DoublesJim Dauer / Yijia Liu vs Chris Demas / Charles Wohlers6-7, 6-1, 1-0
W#2 DoublesBryan Zingg / Chan Kim vs Roy True / David Bluford6-4, 6-7, 1-0
L#3 DoublesChris Long / Scott Oppliger vs Tim Burnett / Steve Fabrizius2-6, 0-6
2022-10-08vs Madhira, UmaWon 21
W#1 DoublesPierce Baldus / Andrew Reed vs David Mohan / Juergen Massey7-5, 6-0
W#2 DoublesDanny Dumit / Nate Anderson vs Paul Watkins / Josh Klingler6-3, 6-3
L#3 DoublesBryan Zingg / Alex Che vs Uma Madhira / Kantha Kanchiraju7-6, 6-7, 0-1
2022-10-01vs Granger, NathanWon 21
W#1 DoublesJim Dauer / Ronald Chen vs Jason Bonet / Shahzad Shafique7-6, 6-3
L#2 DoublesRobert Madison / Chan Kim vs Mark Reed / Nathan Granger5-7, 4-6
W#3 DoublesDanny Dumit / Chris Long vs Jeremy Zwillenberg / Patrick Klein6-3, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings1 teams · 3.5 Men
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Dauer, Jim7117718180

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.36 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.70
Brad Cook
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.68
Jim Dauer
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.59
Andrew Reed
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 4
3.39
Bryan Zingg
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.37
Nate Anderson
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.32
Danny Dumit
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.22
Chris Long
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.14
Alex Che
published 3.5
3.10
Robert Madison
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.06
Chan Kim
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
Ronald Chen
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Scott Oppliger
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
Yijia Liu
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Brad Cook + Ronald Chen4165% gamesnot enough data
Chris Long + Chan Kim314 matchesnot enough data
Andrew Reed + Brad Cook314 matchesnot enough data
Jim Dauer + Brad Cook314 matchesnot enough data
Chan Kim + Jim Dauer213 matchesnot enough data
Andrew Reed + Ronald Chen303 matchesnot enough data
Jim Dauer + Ronald Chen303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Brad Cook
40W–41L career · 2 lines in 2023
7%91%2%
3.70
Jim Dauer
25W–22L career · 5 lines in 2023
10%89%1%
3.68
4
Andrew Reed
30W–21L career · 5 lines in 2023
25%75%<1%
3.59
3.5
Bryan Zingg
55W–34L career · 4 lines in 2023
<1%78%22%
3.39
Nate Anderson
66W–43L career · 3 lines in 2023
<1%82%17%
3.37
3.5
Danny Dumit
32W–23L career · 6 lines in 2023
1%89%10%
3.32
4
Chris Long
28W–36L career · 3 lines in 2023
98%2%<1%
3.22
3.5
Alex Che
1W–3L career · no lines in 2023
16%83%<1%
3.14
Robert Madison
11W–15L career · 2 lines in 2023
24%76%<1%
3.10
3.5
Chan Kim
18W–32L career · 5 lines in 2023
34%66%<1%
3.06
Ronald Chen
13W–10L career · 3 lines in 2023
not enough data
Scott Oppliger
7W–14L career · 4 lines in 2023
not enough data
Yijia Liu
7W–13L career · 2 lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.