Teams

Wildcard

2021 USTA ADULT 18 & OVER - POCATELLO · Women 4.5 - 18 & OVER

7 players · average NTRP 3.92 / IDAHO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2021-06-17vs Highly StrungLost 02
L#1 DoublesNicole Osborn / Cara Sonnemann vs Tracy Johnson / Nyla Kress4-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesSherri Smith / Gina Breding vs Story Holston / Lauren Spain4-6, 3-6
2021-06-07vs Highly StrungLost 02
L#1 DoublesSherri Smith / Cara Sonnemann vs Tracy Johnson / Sydney Stradinger0-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesCindy McRoberts / Gina Breding vs Syndee Kemp / Emilee Cox4-6, 3-6
2021-06-01vs Highly StrungLost 03
L#1 DoublesCindy McRoberts / Carolyn Robbins vs Alice Heberlein / Story Holston1-6, 1-6
L#1 SinglesSherri Smith vs Lauren Spain1-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesNicole Osborn / Gina Breding vs Brittany Grigg / Sydney Stradinger1-6, 3-6
2021-05-27vs Highly StrungLost 03
L#1 DoublesGina Breding / Cindy McRoberts vs Alice Heberlein / Lauren Spain2-6, 1-6
L#1 SinglesSherri Smith vs Nyla Kress1-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesCarolyn Robbins / Cara Sonnemann vs Emilee Cox / Tor Lynn3-6, 1-6
2021-05-19vs Highly StrungLost 02
L#1 DoublesCindy McRoberts / Gina Breding vs Story Holston / Brittany Grigg4-6, 5-7
L#2 DoublesSherri Smith / Nicole Osborn vs Nyla Kress / Tracy Johnson1-6, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings2 teams · Women 4.5 - 18 & OVER
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Highly Strung50150048
2Wildcard0501530181

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.56 estimated across 4 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.96
Debbie Akers
published 4
Carolyn Robbins
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 4
Gina Breding
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.64
Cindy McRoberts
usually #1 Doubles 57%, also #2 Doubles 43% · published 4
3.33
Nicole Osborn
usually #2 Doubles 43%, also #1 Doubles 43% · published 4
3.30
Cara Sonnemann
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
Sherri Smith
usually #1 Singles 40%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Cindy McRoberts + Gina Breding2443% games−8.7% vs expected
Cindy McRoberts + Nicole Osborn134 matchesnot enough data
Gina Breding + Nicole Osborn213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Debbie Akers
20W–7L career · type S · no lines in 2021
<1%63%37%
3.96
4
Carolyn Robbins
17W–33L career · 4 lines in 2021
not enough data
4
Gina Breding
35W–30L career · 8 lines in 2021
not enough data
4
Cindy McRoberts
33W–37L career · 7 lines in 2021
14%86%<1%
3.64
4
Nicole Osborn
38W–53L career · 7 lines in 2021
90%10%<1%
3.33
3.5
Cara Sonnemann
67W–74L career · 6 lines in 2021
1%93%6%
3.30
Sherri Smith
9W–18L career · 5 lines in 2021
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.