Gina Breding
Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Pocatello, ID
104 matches · 51W–53L · seasons 2019–2023
Match history104 matches
L
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
1-6, 2-6
L
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
3-6, 1-6
L
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
2-6, 3-6
W
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-2, 6-4
W
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
3-6, 6-1, 1-0
W
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
7-5, 7-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams22 teams · 2019–2023
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level9 levels played
4.0
75%
21W–7L · 56.3% of games
4.5
0%
0W–8L · 34.2% of games
7.0
2W–0L
not enough matches yet
8.0
40%
2W–3L · 41% of games
7.0mixed
60%
3W–2L · 52.3% of games
7.5mixed
75%
12W–4L · 60.5% of games
8.0mixed
26.9%
7W–19L · 42.6% of games
8.5mixed
30%
3W–7L · 43.7% of games
9.0mixed
25%
1W–3L · 46.8% of games
Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.
By lineusually #1 Doubles, 39% of the time
#1 Doubles
39%
41 matches
#2 Doubles
39%
40 matches
#3 Doubles
22%
23 matches
How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.
Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.
What matters isn’t how well you play when you’re playing well. What matters is how well you play when you’re playing badly.