Teams

OC Los Cab - Tracy

2024 SCTA Doubles 18 & Over - OC · OC Women WE - 4.5

9 players · average NTRP 4.40 / SO.CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2024-12-01vs OC CMTC - Michelle/Ly - 9amLost 01
L#2 DoublesKelly Casares / Sabrina MacLachlan vs Rachel Om / Megan Riley4-6, 1-6
2024-11-30vs OC LLW CMTC - Kristina - Sat1Split 11
W#1 DoublesTracy Harris / Sabrina MacLachlan vs Renee Walton / Mina Whitlock6-4, 1-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesJudy Lee Vogt / Samantha Mills vs Kristina Ebon / Karen Trinh3-6, 1-6
2024-11-09vs OC Lifetime RSC - Tristen - Sat1Won 10
W#2 DoublesCarolina Groff Hinojosa / Judy Lee Vogt vs Jennifer Hatfield / Blake Spencer7-6, 7-5
L#2 DoublesTiana Takenaga / Carolina Groff Hinojosa vs Kyla Kotcherha / Sarah Stadfelt3-6, 6-1, 0-1
2024-10-26vs OC LPC - Hye Jin - Sat9Won 10
W#1 DoublesSamantha Mills / Ivette Dunlop vs Chi Rauen / Junko Kuroda6-4, 6-7, 1-0
W#2 DoublesCarolina Groff Hinojosa / Tiana Takenaga vs Emily Wu / Dana Kim3-6, 6-3, 1-0
L#2 DoublesTracy Harris / Sabrina MacLachlan vs Teresa Chow / Masami Hashimoto4-6, 4-6
2024-10-05vs OC LPC - BlancoLost 01
L#2 DoublesKelly Casares / Ivette Dunlop vs Laura McManus / Tamara Tayles0-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for OC Women WE - 4.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.04 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.31
Ivette Dunlop
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 4.5
4.26
Karen Haas
published
4.09
Kristina McKee
published
4.01
Avriel Webb
published 4.5
4.01
Carolina Groff Hinojosa
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
4.00
Judy Lee Vogt
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
3.94
Samantha Mills
published
3.68
Sabrina MacLachlan
usually #1 Doubles 54%, also #2 Doubles 39% · published 4
Kelly Casares
published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Ivette Dunlop
130W–94L career · 2 lines in 2024
1%90%9%
4.31
Karen Haas
0W–4L career · no lines in 2024
no projection at this level
4.26
Kristina McKee
5W–6L career · no lines in 2024
26%74%<1%
4.09
4.5
Avriel Webb
1W–2L career · no lines in 2024
48%52%<1%
4.01
4.5
Carolina Groff Hinojosa
1W–5L career · 2 lines in 2024
48%52%<1%
4.01
4.5
Judy Lee Vogt
48W–36L career · 2 lines in 2024
50%50%<1%
4.00
Samantha Mills
1W–5L career · no lines in 2024
66%34%<1%
3.94
4
Sabrina MacLachlan
190W–130L career · 13 lines in 2024
10%89%1%
3.68
Kelly Casares
0W–2L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.