Teams

OC Irvine Heritage Park - Emily - Sun1

2024 SCTA Doubles 18 & Over - OC · OC Women WE - 5.0+

11 players · average NTRP 4.75 / SO.CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
2024-11-03vs OC Los Cab - TracySplit 11
L#1 DoublesIsabelle Benoit / So-Young Walsh vs Amy Caldwell / Farrah Northcott3-6, 0-6
W#2 DoublesKyla Kotcherha / Sarah Stadfelt vs Tiana Takenaga / Carolina Groff Hinojosa6-3, 1-6, 1-0
2024-10-13vs OC Los Cab - TracyLost 03
L#1 DoublesKatie Chang / Sarah Stadfelt vs Jennifer Beindorf / Amy Caldwell5-7, 4-6
L#1 SinglesKatie Moore vs Kathy Archibald2-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesEmily Wu / Dana Kim vs Carolina Groff Hinojosa / Tiana Takenaga6-3, 3-6, 0-1
2024-10-06vs OC LLW LNRC - Maggie- Sat1030Lost 12
L#1 DoublesKatie Chang / Lauren Yoon vs Maggie Mello Harrah / Erynne Mercado5-7, 3-6
W#1 SinglesSabastiani Leon Chao vs Clarissa Smith6-0, 6-0
L#2 DoublesKatie Moore / Kyla Kotcherha vs Claire Handa / Jennifer Dubow2-6, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for OC Women WE - 5.0+ have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.43 estimated across 4 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.82
Isabelle Benoit
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
4.80
Dianne Matias
published 5
4.30
Dana Kim
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
3.82
Katie Moore
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published
Emily Wu
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Katie Chang
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Kyla Kotcherha
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Lauren Yoon
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Sabastiani Leon Chao
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
Sarah Stadfelt
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
So-Young Walsh
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Isabelle Benoit
6W–3L career · 1 line in 2024
no projection at this level
4.82
5
Dianne Matias
3W–2L career · no lines in 2024
no projection at this level
4.80
4.5
Dana Kim
4W–10L career · 1 line in 2024
2%91%7%
4.30
Katie Moore
3W–8L career · 2 lines in 2024
no projection at this level
3.82
Emily Wu
2W–12L career · 1 line in 2024
not enough data
Katie Chang
1W–3L career · 2 lines in 2024
not enough data
Kyla Kotcherha
2W–4L career · 2 lines in 2024
not enough data
Lauren Yoon
5W–4L career · 1 line in 2024
not enough data
Sabastiani Leon Chao
1W–0L career · 1 line in 2024
not enough data
Sarah Stadfelt
5W–2L career · 2 lines in 2024
not enough data
So-Young Walsh
1W–4L career · 1 line in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.