Teams

OC Los Cab - Tracy

2024 SCTA Doubles 18 & Over - OC · OC Women WE - 5.0+

11 players · average NTRP 4.75 / SO.CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
L#1 SinglesMaria O'Connor vs Emily Wu6-7, 4-6
2024-11-09vs OC LLW LNRC - Maggie- Sat1030Lost 01
L#1 SinglesMaria O'Connor vs Claire Handa1-6, 3-6
W#1 DoublesAmy Caldwell / Farrah Northcott vs Isabelle Benoit / So-Young Walsh6-3, 6-0
L#2 DoublesTiana Takenaga / Carolina Groff Hinojosa vs Kyla Kotcherha / Sarah Stadfelt3-6, 6-1, 0-1
2024-10-27vs OC LPC - MouttapaWon 10
W#1 SinglesMaria O'Connor vs Masami Hashimoto6-3, 2-6, 1-0
2024-10-20vs OC LLW LNRC - Maggie- Sat1030Lost 01
L#1 SinglesMaria O'Connor vs Izabela Mijic0-6, 6-3, 0-1
W#1 DoublesJennifer Beindorf / Amy Caldwell vs Katie Chang / Sarah Stadfelt7-5, 6-4
W#1 SinglesKathy Archibald vs Katie Moore6-2, 6-3
W#2 DoublesCarolina Groff Hinojosa / Tiana Takenaga vs Emily Wu / Dana Kim3-6, 6-3, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for OC Women WE - 5.0+ have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.56 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

5.03
Kathy Archibald
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
4.92
Anja Clarke
published 5
4.90
4.84
Tiana Takenaga
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
4.69
Mia Fogh
published
4.61
Jennifer Beindorf
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
4.57
Farrah Northcott
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
4.26
Karen Haas
published
4.25
Maria O'Connor
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 4.5
4.09
Kristina McKee
published
4.01
Carolina Groff Hinojosa
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Kathy Archibald
17W–3L career · 1 line in 2024
no projection at this level
5.03
5
Anja Clarke
6W–2L career · no lines in 2024
no projection at this level
4.92
5
Amanda Parson Siegel
33W–9L career · no lines in 2024
no projection at this level
4.90
Tiana Takenaga
5W–3L career · 2 lines in 2024
no projection at this level
4.84
Mia Fogh
1W–2L career · no lines in 2024
no projection at this level
4.69
Jennifer Beindorf
15W–7L career · 1 line in 2024
no projection at this level
4.61
Farrah Northcott
6W–8L career · 1 line in 2024
no projection at this level
4.57
Karen Haas
0W–4L career · no lines in 2024
no projection at this level
4.26
4.5
Maria O'Connor
48W–39L career · 4 lines in 2024
4%93%4%
4.25
Kristina McKee
5W–6L career · no lines in 2024
26%74%<1%
4.09
4.5
Carolina Groff Hinojosa
1W–5L career · 2 lines in 2024
48%52%<1%
4.01

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.