Teams

SFV-40 Love/D Lula & Dubkin

2025 SoCal Doubles 18 SFV Fall WE · SFV 18 WEEKEND - Men 3.5

13 players · average NTRP 3.50 / SO.CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule1 played
2025-10-05vs SFV-Knights at Court/O HeumLost 12
L#1 DoublesAngel Tirado / Tony Lujan vs Sergio Martinez / John Byeon2-6, 6-2, 0-1
W#2 DoublesTeddy Tran / David Jeffries vs Ola Heum / Andy Badal6-4, 6-3
L#3 DoublesJim Latson / Fabricio Apuy vs Tom Pudpai / Edgar Giasyan3-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for SFV 18 WEEKEND - Men 3.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.26 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.77
Pei Xu
published
3.43
Teddy Tran
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.34
John Latson
published
3.26
Angel Tirado
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.21
Dan Lula
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.20
Tony Lujan
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.19
Matthieu Corfmat
published
3.17
David Jeffries
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.16
Andrew Wheeler
published 3.5
3.12
Jim Latson
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.06
Monte Donovan
published
Fabricio Apuy
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Roman Kuperman
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Andrew Wheeler + Dan Lula213 matchesnot enough data
Dan Lula + Matthieu Corfmat033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Pei Xu
16W–6L career · no lines in 2025
3%92%5%
3.77
Teddy Tran
11W–9L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%68%32%
3.43
John Latson
10W–5L career · no lines in 2025
1%87%13%
3.34
3.5
Angel Tirado
12W–14L career · 1 line in 2025
3%93%4%
3.26
3.5
Dan Lula
138W–81L career · 3 lines in 2025
7%91%2%
3.21
Tony Lujan
15W–8L career · 1 line in 2025
7%91%2%
3.20
Matthieu Corfmat
13W–15L career · no lines in 2025
9%89%1%
3.19
3.5
David Jeffries
2W–4L career · 1 line in 2025
11%88%1%
3.17
3.5
Andrew Wheeler
7W–12L career · no lines in 2025
13%86%1%
3.16
Jim Latson
1W–4L career · 1 line in 2025
20%80%<1%
3.12
Monte Donovan
5W–10L career · no lines in 2025
32%68%<1%
3.06
Fabricio Apuy
2W–5L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Roman Kuperman
5W–0L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.