Teams

SFV-Knights at Court/O Heum

2025 SoCal Doubles 18 SFV Fall WE · SFV 18 WEEKEND - Men 3.5

9 players · average NTRP 3.50 / SO.CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule2 played
2025-10-05vs SFV-40 Love/D Lula & DubkinWon 21
W#1 DoublesSergio Martinez / John Byeon vs Angel Tirado / Tony Lujan6-2, 2-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesOla Heum / Andy Badal vs Teddy Tran / David Jeffries4-6, 3-6
W#3 DoublesTom Pudpai / Edgar Giasyan vs Jim Latson / Fabricio Apuy6-3, 6-2
2025-09-21vs SFV-Paseo United/Mike ZeltserWon 21
W#1 DoublesSergio Martinez / John Byeon vs Oscar Campos / Rafael Puno7-6, 7-5
L#2 DoublesHayk Ghulijanyan / Ola Heum vs Jacobus Admiraal / Patrick Tamondong3-6, 6-4, 1-0
W#3 DoublesEdgar Giasyan / Kirill Smolskiy vs James Wambolt / Terry Wingo6-2, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for SFV 18 WEEKEND - Men 3.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.41 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.58
John Byeon
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.58
Hayk Ghulijanyan
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.53
Tom Pudpai
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.45
Shawn Broukhim
published
3.39
Andy Badal
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.36
Ola Heum
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.22
Sergio Martinez
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.13
Kirill Smolskiy
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Edgar Giasyan
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

John Byeon + Sergio Martinez303 matchesnot enough data
Ola Heum + Hayk Ghulijanyan123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

John Byeon
9W–11L career · 2 lines in 2025
27%73%<1%
3.58
Hayk Ghulijanyan
7W–6L career · 1 line in 2025
28%72%<1%
3.58
Tom Pudpai
11W–11L career · 1 line in 2025
41%59%<1%
3.53
Shawn Broukhim
5W–6L career · no lines in 2025
64%36%<1%
3.45
3.5
Andy Badal
3W–6L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%79%21%
3.39
Ola Heum
4W–11L career · 2 lines in 2025
85%15%<1%
3.36
Sergio Martinez
7W–3L career · 2 lines in 2025
6%92%2%
3.22
Kirill Smolskiy
7W–11L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%17%83%
3.13
Edgar Giasyan
2W–2L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.