Teams

CSRC CARPENTER

2022 USTA ADULT 18 & OVER - SOCO · WOMEN 4.0 - 18 & OVER - SOCO

10 players · average NTRP 3.75 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2022-05-30vs LTFCS RYALSWon 32
W#1 DoublesJennifer Emerson / Kristen Lange vs Kimberly Peterson / Terri Plummer6-2, 6-4
L#1 SinglesVincenta van Every vs Tatiana Merkoulova6-2, 4-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesSandra Cook / DARLENE WARMOUTH vs Daria Parker / Anne Ryals3-6, 7-5, 0-1
W#2 SinglesJennifer Kapitan vs Dianna Farquharson6-3, 6-0
W#3 DoublesLeanne Thompson / Susan Wilklow vs Laura Schafer / Debra Orton6-2, 0-6, 1-0
2022-05-16vs MEMPK GORTHYLost 23
L#1 DoublesKristen Lange / Jennifer Emerson vs Nancy Barker / Amanda Irons3-6, 2-6
W#1 SinglesJennifer Kapitan vs Angela Sullivan6-1, 6-4
L#2 DoublesSusan Wilklow / Sandra Cook vs Cheryl Gorthy / Noriko Moody4-6, 2-6
W#2 SinglesCandace McCollett vs Bonnie Iten4-6, 6-1, 1-0
L#3 DoublesDARLENE WARMOUTH / Kathleen White vs Teena Crum / Kayla Breedlove7-6, 4-6, 1-0
2022-05-09vs CCW FALKWon 41
L#1 DoublesLeanne Thompson / Susan Wilklow vs Renee Crisler / Terry Olerich3-6, 6-4, 0-1
W#1 SinglesCandace McCollett vs Katie Borden1-6, 7-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesJennifer Emerson / Kristen Lange vs Wendy Jones / Sonia Garrison6-3, 7-5
W#2 SinglesJennifer Kapitan vs April Falk6-2, 2-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesPatty Carpenter / Sandra Cook vs Stephanie Brock / Mary Robins6-2, 6-4
2022-05-02vs LTFCS RYALSWon 32
W#1 DoublesJennifer Emerson / Kristen Lange vs Susan Moore / Laura Schafer2-6, 6-3, 1-0
W#1 SinglesCandace McCollett vs Tatiana Merkoulova7-6, 6-1
L#2 DoublesJennifer Kapitan / Leanne Thompson vs Charlie Bishop / Rachel Rocks3-6, 3-6
W#2 SinglesVincenta van Every vs Annette Markert6-2, 3-0
L#3 DoublesPatty Carpenter / Sandra Cook vs Dianna Farquharson / Vicki Gess6-4, 3-6, 1-0
2022-04-25vs MEMPK GORTHYWon 32
W#1 DoublesJennifer Emerson / Kristen Lange vs JESSEE BARLOW / Cheryl Gorthy6-2, 6-2
L#1 SinglesCandace McCollett vs Maggie Hartman6-4, 4-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesPatty Carpenter / Sandra Cook vs Nancy Barker / Amanda Irons6-3, 6-3
L#2 SinglesVincenta van Every vs Noriko Moody4-6, 7-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesDARLENE WARMOUTH / Kathleen White vs Kayla Breedlove / Susan Schmidt6-4, 6-3
2022-04-18vs CCW FALKWon 32
W#1 DoublesJennifer Emerson / Kristen Lange vs Wendy Jones / Terry Olerich7-6, 6-4
L#1 SinglesVincenta van Every vs Katie Borden4-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesPatty Carpenter / Sandra Cook vs Elizabeth Mayo / Sara Michon5-7, 4-6
W#2 SinglesCandace McCollett vs Leslie Brewer7-6, 6-2
W#3 DoublesLeanne Thompson / DARLENE WARMOUTH vs Stephanie Brock / Jenny McCabe3-6, 6-4, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for WOMEN 4.0 - 18 & OVER - SOCO have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.56 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.74
Leanne Thompson
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.67
Patty Carpenter
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
3.65
Candace McCollett
usually #1 Singles 60%, also #2 Singles 40% · published 4
3.44
Susan Wilklow
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.29
Vincenta van Every
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #2 Singles 50% · published
DARLENE WARMOUTH
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
Jennifer Kapitan
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
Kathleen White
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Kristen Lange
usually #1 Doubles 83%, also #2 Doubles 17% · published
Sandra Cook
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Sandra Cook + Patty Carpenter81345% games−1.9% vs expected
Sandra Cook + DARLENE WARMOUTH2444% games−3.2% vs expected
Susan Wilklow + Leanne Thompson134 matchesnot enough data
Patty Carpenter + DARLENE WARMOUTH033 matchesnot enough data
Leanne Thompson + Vincenta van Every123 matchesnot enough data
Kathleen White + DARLENE WARMOUTH123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Leanne Thompson
96W–110L career · 4 lines in 2022
3%95%2%
3.74
Patty Carpenter
46W–60L career · 4 lines in 2022
10%89%1%
3.67
4
Candace McCollett
58W–104L career · 5 lines in 2022
12%88%<1%
3.65
3.5
Susan Wilklow
18W–37L career · 3 lines in 2022
<1%69%31%
3.44
Vincenta van Every
41W–39L career · 4 lines in 2022
1%93%5%
3.29
3.5
DARLENE WARMOUTH
29W–32L career · 4 lines in 2022
not enough data
Jennifer Kapitan
43W–38L career · 4 lines in 2022
not enough data
Kathleen White
7W–10L career · 2 lines in 2022
not enough data
Kristen Lange
26W–16L career · 6 lines in 2022
not enough data
Sandra Cook
24W–31L career · 6 lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.