Teams

MEMPK GORTHY

2022 USTA ADULT 18 & OVER - SOCO · WOMEN 4.0 - 18 & OVER - SOCO

11 players · average NTRP 3.92 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2022-05-23vs CCW FALKLost 13
W#1 DoublesMaggie Hartman / Bonnie Iten vs Sonia Garrison / Sara Michon6-1, 6-4
L#1 SinglesKayla Breedlove vs Katie Borden4-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesAngela Sullivan / Cheryl Gorthy vs Elizabeth Mayo / Christine Butler1-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesNoriko Moody / Teena Crum vs Susan Turner / Leslie Brewer7-5, 3-6, 0-1
2022-05-16vs CSRC CARPENTERWon 32
W#1 DoublesNancy Barker / Amanda Irons vs Kristen Lange / Jennifer Emerson6-3, 6-2
L#1 SinglesAngela Sullivan vs Jennifer Kapitan1-6, 4-6
W#2 DoublesCheryl Gorthy / Noriko Moody vs Susan Wilklow / Sandra Cook6-4, 6-2
L#2 SinglesBonnie Iten vs Candace McCollett6-4, 1-6, 0-1
W#3 DoublesTeena Crum / Kayla Breedlove vs DARLENE WARMOUTH / Kathleen White7-6, 4-6, 1-0
2022-05-09vs LTFCS RYALSSplit 22
L#1 DoublesMaggie Hartman / Bonnie Iten vs Kimberly Peterson / Terri Plummer6-4, 3-6, 1-0
W#1 SinglesNoriko Moody vs Tatiana Merkoulova6-4, 6-4
W#2 DoublesSusan Schmidt / Angela Sullivan vs Dianna Farquharson / Rachel Rocks2-6, 7-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesTeena Crum / Tammy Farnsworth vs Charlie Bishop / Anne Ryals0-6, 2-6
2022-05-02vs CCW FALKLost 14
L#1 DoublesNancy Barker / Amanda Irons vs Wendy Jones / April Falk0-6, 1-6
L#1 SinglesMaggie Hartman vs Renee Crisler1-6, 1-6
W#2 DoublesCheryl Gorthy / JESSEE BARLOW vs Leslie Brewer / Christine Butler6-3, 6-1
L#2 SinglesAngela Sullivan vs Katie Borden2-6, 6-7
L#3 DoublesTeena Crum / Tammy Farnsworth vs Stephanie Brock / Sara Michon3-6, 3-6
2022-04-25vs CSRC CARPENTERLost 23
L#1 DoublesJESSEE BARLOW / Cheryl Gorthy vs Jennifer Emerson / Kristen Lange2-6, 2-6
W#1 SinglesMaggie Hartman vs Candace McCollett4-6, 6-4, 1-0
L#2 DoublesNancy Barker / Amanda Irons vs Patty Carpenter / Sandra Cook3-6, 3-6
W#2 SinglesNoriko Moody vs Vincenta van Every4-6, 7-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesKayla Breedlove / Susan Schmidt vs DARLENE WARMOUTH / Kathleen White4-6, 3-6
2022-04-18vs LTFCS RYALSWon 32
L#1 DoublesSusan Schmidt / Cheryl Gorthy vs Daria Parker / Rachel Rocks2-6, 6-3, 0-1
W#1 SinglesMaggie Hartman vs Tatiana Merkoulova6-1, 6-4
L#2 DoublesBonnie Iten / Noriko Moody vs Susan Moore / Laura Schafer6-3, 2-6, 0-1
W#2 SinglesAngela Sullivan vs Annette Markert6-3, 6-3
W#3 DoublesNancy Barker / Amanda Irons vs Anne Ryals / Dianna Farquharson6-2, 7-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for WOMEN 4.0 - 18 & OVER - SOCO have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.59 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.91
Nancy Barker
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
JESSEE BARLOW
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.75
Noriko Moody
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #2 Singles 20% · published
3.68
Bonnie Iten
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Singles 25% · published 4
3.66
Cheryl Gorthy
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 4
3.65
Angela Sullivan
usually #2 Singles 40%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 4
3.60
Kayla Breedlove
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Singles 33% · published 4
3.28
Maggie Hartman
usually #1 Singles 60%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published
3.17
Amanda Irons
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
Tammy Farnsworth
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Teena Crum
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Bonnie Iten + Noriko Moody4258% games+9.4% vs expected
Maggie Hartman + Bonnie Iten5158% games+5.6% vs expected
Kayla Breedlove + Nancy Barker2448% games+3.1% vs expected
Cheryl Gorthy + Angela Sullivan10946% games−6.1% vs expected
Teena Crum + Tammy Farnsworth1533% games−13.1% vs expected
Kayla Breedlove + Cheryl Gorthy2351% gamesnot enough data
Kayla Breedlove + Bonnie Iten3245% gamesnot enough data
Nancy Barker + Amanda Irons3249% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Nancy Barker
116W–48L career · 4 lines in 2022
<1%76%24%
3.91
4
JESSEE BARLOW
9W–9L career · 2 lines in 2022
not enough data
Noriko Moody
45W–34L career · 5 lines in 2022
3%95%3%
3.75
4
Bonnie Iten
45W–25L career · 4 lines in 2022
8%91%1%
3.68
4
Cheryl Gorthy
25W–27L career · 5 lines in 2022
11%88%<1%
3.66
4
Angela Sullivan
33W–28L career · 5 lines in 2022
12%88%<1%
3.65
4
Kayla Breedlove
43W–69L career · 3 lines in 2022
21%78%<1%
3.60
Maggie Hartman
31W–22L career · 5 lines in 2022
95%5%<1%
3.28
3.5
Amanda Irons
26W–36L career · 4 lines in 2022
9%90%1%
3.17
Tammy Farnsworth
1W–5L career · 2 lines in 2022
not enough data
Teena Crum
3W–7L career · 4 lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.