Teams

EYMCA-Fulton

2026 ADULT 65 & Over · 6.0 Women (A65)

11 players · average NTRP 3.00 / SOUTHERN OREGON

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2026-07-11vs ACB-FergusonSplit 11
W#1 DoublesKueiying Chang / Ayako James vs Diane Walker / Rosalee Hermens6-4, 6-3
L#2 DoublesJoan Fulton / Anne Dean vs Pam Gillet / Naovarat Thompson1-6, 2-6
2026-06-21vs ACB-FergusonLost 12
W#1 DoublesAyako James / Kueiying Chang vs Naovarat Thompson / Lindi Dewolf7-5, 6-2
L#2 DoublesJulie Hess / Penny McAvoy vs Susan Berado / Tracey Moore0-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesDiane Robison / Joan Fulton vs Dorothy Ferguson / Anne Shoemaker3-6, 0-6
2026-06-06vs SOR-STSC-HumphreyLost 12
L#1 DoublesJoan Fulton / Susan MacOmson vs Ruth Katter / Jodi Berg1-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesCarol Bridgens / Barbara Theobald vs Marie Carver / Meredyth Edelson4-6, 6-7
W#3 DoublesJulie Hess / Anne Dean vs Bobbie Clyde / Tina Rogers3-6, 6-4, 1-0
2026-05-17vs TTC-LeeLost 03
L#1 DoublesBarbara Theobald / Karen Ziros-Smith vs Lori Fulton / Patti Youngren4-6, 7-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesDiane Robison / Joan Fulton vs Nancy MacMorris-Adix / Judith Light2-6, 0-6
L#3 DoublesCarol Bridgens / Penny McAvoy vs GwenEllyn Anderson / Kelly Saltveit4-6, 3-6
2026-05-09vs TTC-LeeLost 03
L#1 DoublesBarbara Theobald / Karen Ziros-Smith vs Corinne Butzin / Clare Reimers3-6, 6-4, 0-1
L#2 DoublesJulie Hess / Ayako James vs Lori Fulton / Sherri Ross0-6, 0-6
L#3 DoublesDiane Robison / Kueiying Chang vs Paula Armstrong / Judith Light1-6, 3-6
2026-04-18vs SOR-STSC-HumphreyLost 12
L#1 DoublesBarbara Theobald / Karen Ziros-Smith vs Susan Humphrey / Meredyth Edelson6-7, 2-6
L#2 DoublesSusan MacOmson / Ayako James vs Annette Hatley / Ruth Katter5-7, 2-6
W#3 DoublesAnne Dean / Kueiying Chang vs Gloria Flager / Donna Nickerson2-6, 6-4, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 6.0 Women (A65) have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.69 estimated across 4 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.05
Anne Dean
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
Carol Bridgens
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.70
Barbara Theobald
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.69
Ayako James
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.34
Diane Robison
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
Joan Fulton
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
Julie Hess
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
Karen Ziros-Smith
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Kueiying Chang
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
Penny McAvoy
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Susan MacOmson
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Karen Ziros-Smith + Barbara Theobald044 matchesnot enough data
Karen Ziros-Smith + Penny McAvoy033 matchesnot enough data
Joan Fulton + Anne Dean033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Anne Dean
4W–6L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%37%63%
3.05
3
Carol Bridgens
0W–2L career · type S · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data
3
Barbara Theobald
0W–9L career · 4 lines in 2026
8%91%2%
2.70
3
Ayako James
16W–26L career · 4 lines in 2026
9%90%1%
2.69
3
Diane Robison
0W–3L career · type S · 3 lines in 2026
87%13%<1%
2.34
Joan Fulton
0W–10L career · 4 lines in 2026
not enough data
Julie Hess
1W–8L career · 3 lines in 2026
not enough data
Karen Ziros-Smith
0W–9L career · 3 lines in 2026
not enough data
Kueiying Chang
3W–5L career · 4 lines in 2026
not enough data
Penny McAvoy
0W–8L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data
Susan MacOmson
0W–7L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.