Teams

SOR-STSC-Humphrey

2026 ADULT 65 & Over · 6.0 Women (A65)

14 players · average NTRP 3.00 / SOUTHERN OREGON

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2026-06-20vs ACB-FergusonWon 30
W#1 DoublesRuth Katter / Jodi Berg vs Lindi Dewolf / Naovarat Thompson6-2, 6-3
W#2 DoublesVerena Wessel / Bonnie Heitsch vs Tracey Moore / Dorothy Ferguson6-2, 6-1
W#3 DoublesDonna Nickerson / Gloria Flager vs Susan Berado / Laura Murray6-0, 6-1
2026-06-06vs EYMCA-FultonWon 21
W#1 DoublesRuth Katter / Jodi Berg vs Joan Fulton / Susan MacOmson6-1, 6-2
W#2 DoublesMarie Carver / Meredyth Edelson vs Carol Bridgens / Barbara Theobald6-4, 7-6
L#3 DoublesBobbie Clyde / Tina Rogers vs Julie Hess / Anne Dean3-6, 6-4, 1-0
2026-05-16vs ACB-FergusonLost 02
L#1 DoublesSusan Humphrey / Annette Hatley vs Pam Gillet / Roberta Mason6-3, 1-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesBonnie Heitsch / Vicki Kimpton vs Lindi Dewolf / Rosalee Hermens4-6, 6-4, 0-1
2026-04-19vs TTC-LeeWon 21
W#1 DoublesVerena Wessel / Vicki Kimpton vs Corinne Butzin / Clare Reimers6-4, 6-2
L#2 DoublesBobbie Clyde / Tina Rogers vs Kathleen Lee / Lori Fulton4-6, 0-6
W#3 DoublesMarie Carver / Bonnie Heitsch vs Nancy MacMorris-Adix / Kelly Saltveit6-1, 6-3
2026-04-18vs EYMCA-FultonWon 21
W#1 DoublesSusan Humphrey / Meredyth Edelson vs Barbara Theobald / Karen Ziros-Smith7-6, 6-2
W#2 DoublesAnnette Hatley / Ruth Katter vs Susan MacOmson / Ayako James7-5, 6-2
L#3 DoublesGloria Flager / Donna Nickerson vs Anne Dean / Kueiying Chang6-2, 4-6, 0-1
2026-04-11vs TTC-LeeWon 30
W#1 DoublesVerena Wessel / Vicki Kimpton vs Corinne Butzin / Patti Youngren7-5, 7-6
W#2 DoublesSusan Humphrey / Annette Hatley vs Paula Armstrong / Kathleen Lee6-0, 6-4
W#3 DoublesGloria Flager / Bobbie Clyde vs Judith Light / Kelly Saltveit7-5, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 6.0 Women (A65) have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.87 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.38
Gloria Flager
usually #3 Doubles 78%, also #2 Doubles 11% · published 3.5
3.04
Susan Humphrey
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.90
Annette Hatley
usually #2 Doubles 38%, also #1 Doubles 38% · published 3
2.76
Bonnie Heitsch
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.75
Meredyth Edelson
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
2.37
Bobbie Clyde
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 2.5
Donna Nickerson
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Jodi Berg
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Marie Carver
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Ruth Katter
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Suzi Cote
published
Tina Rogers
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
Verena Wessel
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Vicki Kimpton
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Susan Humphrey + Annette Hatley341758% games−4.0% vs expected
Tina Rogers + Jodi Berg3937% gamesnot enough data
Donna Nickerson + Gloria Flager6360% gamesnot enough data
Bobbie Clyde + Gloria Flager5165% gamesnot enough data
Ruth Katter + Annette Hatley3350% gamesnot enough data
Bonnie Heitsch + Meredyth Edelson4264% gamesnot enough data
Ruth Katter + Jodi Berg3253% gamesnot enough data
Marie Carver + Annette Hatley224 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Gloria Flager
104W–53L career · 9 lines in 2026
<1%80%20%
3.38
3
Susan Humphrey
71W–37L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%39%61%
3.04
3
Annette Hatley
88W–67L career · 8 lines in 2026
<1%76%24%
2.90
3
Bonnie Heitsch
37W–23L career · 3 lines in 2026
3%93%4%
2.76
Meredyth Edelson
39W–25L career · 2 lines in 2026
4%93%4%
2.75
2.5
Bobbie Clyde
10W–9L career · 3 lines in 2026
0%82%18%
2.37
Donna Nickerson
9W–18L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data
Jodi Berg
26W–36L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data
Marie Carver
18W–13L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data
Ruth Katter
20W–40L career · 3 lines in 2026
not enough data
Suzi Cote
14W–31L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
Tina Rogers
6W–20L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data
Verena Wessel
7W–7L career · 3 lines in 2026
not enough data
Vicki Kimpton
25W–7L career · 3 lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.