Teams

Big Canoe - Sharon Petrey

2026 MTA Southern Combo 40 & Over Women · Women's 6.5

15 players · average NTRP 3.36 / GEORGIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2025-12-04vs Mountain - Christie TuckerSplit 11
L#1 DoublesJana Andringa / Diana Mahaney vs Christie Tucker / Patty Tynes4-6, 6-7
W#2 DoublesJackie Duncan / Karen Davis vs Darra Schmidt / Terry Cullen6-3, 7-6
2025-11-15vs Meeks Park - Tamara PearsonLost 02
L#2 DoublesDiana Mahaney / Teri Koviac vs Norma-Jean Baxter / Melanie Stevens7-6, 2-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesSharon Petrey / Cindy Tully vs Lynn Blanchard / Ann Lewis3-6, 3-6
L#1 DoublesKaren Davis / Donna Symons vs Kay Cruickshank / Yan Key3-6, 4-6
W#2 DoublesGail Fargason / Deena Wilson vs Dee Campbell / Paola Mitchell6-2, 6-1
L#3 DoublesMary Jane Egan / Antonia Rogers vs Martha Forlines / Joy Hice6-2, 0-6, 0-1
2025-11-01vs Mountain - Christie TuckerWon 21
L#1 DoublesTeri Koviac / Sarah Venable vs Christie Tucker / Darra Schmidt2-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesDiana Mahaney / Karen Davis vs Terry Cullen / Shawn Morrill6-4, 6-1
W#3 DoublesJana Andringa / Therese Welch vs Lauren McCormick / Lisa Rodgers6-4, 6-2
2025-10-18vs Gilmer County P&R - Christie TuckerSplit 11
L#1 DoublesAntonia Rogers / Mary Lynn Cagle vs Yan Key / Joy Hice5-7, 0-6
W#3 DoublesBarbara Fraser / Mary Jane Egan vs Jacqueline Medeiros / Paola Mitchell6-4, 6-4
2025-10-11vs Mountain - Christie TuckerWon 21
L#1 DoublesSharon Petrey / Mary Lynn Cagle vs Christie Tucker / Patty Tynes2-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesJana Andringa / Sarah Venable vs Denise Eilers / Darra Schmidt6-4, 3-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesDiana Mahaney / Teri Koviac vs Lisa Rodgers / Lauren McCormick6-2, 6-2
2025-09-20vs Meeks Park - Tamara PearsonWon 21
L#1 DoublesTeri Koviac / Donna Symons vs Karen Baker / Norma-Jean Baxter5-7, 6-4, 0-1
W#2 DoublesMary Lynn Cagle / Antonia Rogers vs Susan Ross / Anita Wicklund7-6, 4-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesDeena Wilson / Mary Jane Egan vs Connie Hinton / Tamara Pearson6-4, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Women's 6.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.94 estimated across 13 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.25
Donna Symons
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
Jackie Duncan
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.22
Diana Mahaney
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.17
Antonia Rogers
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.12
Mary Jane Egan
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.11
Deena Wilson
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
2.97
Mary Lynn Cagle
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
2.96
Teri Koviac
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
2.94
Gail Fargason
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.77
Sarah Venable
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
2.72
Therese Welch
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.70
Sharon Petrey
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
2.69
Jana Andringa
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
2.60
Cindy Tully
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
Lori Shiffman
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Diana Mahaney + Sarah Venable3444% gamesnot enough data
Diana Mahaney + Teri Koviac134 matchesnot enough data
Therese Welch + Jana Andringa213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Donna Symons
9W–4L career · type S · 2 lines in 2026
3%95%3%
3.25
3.5
Jackie Duncan
2W–1L career · type S · 1 line in 2026
not enough data
3.5
Diana Mahaney
5W–9L career · type S · 4 lines in 2026
4%94%2%
3.22
3.5
Antonia Rogers
2W–2L career · type S · 3 lines in 2026
9%90%1%
3.17
Mary Jane Egan
2W–5L career · 3 lines in 2026
17%83%<1%
3.12
3.5
Deena Wilson
21W–8L career · type S · 2 lines in 2026
21%79%<1%
3.11
Mary Lynn Cagle
2W–5L career · 3 lines in 2026
58%42%<1%
2.97
Teri Koviac
4W–10L career · 4 lines in 2026
62%38%<1%
2.96
3
Gail Fargason
4W–10L career · type S · 1 line in 2026
<1%69%31%
2.94
Sarah Venable
4W–9L career · 2 lines in 2026
96%4%<1%
2.77
Therese Welch
2W–7L career · 1 line in 2026
98%2%<1%
2.72
Sharon Petrey
2W–12L career · 2 lines in 2026
99%1%<1%
2.70
Jana Andringa
28W–28L career · 3 lines in 2026
99%1%<1%
2.69
3
Cindy Tully
0W–5L career · type S · 1 line in 2026
21%79%<1%
2.60
Lori Shiffman
0W–2L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.