Teams

Meeks Park - Tamara Pearson

2026 MTA Southern Combo 40 & Over Women · Women's 6.5

11 players · average NTRP 3.38 / GEORGIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2025-12-06vs Mountain - Christie TuckerWon 30
W#1 DoublesAllyson Brantley / Susan Ross vs Christie Tucker / Patty Tynes3-6, 7-5, 1-0
W#2 DoublesHolly Cannon / Melanie Stevens vs Melinda Boudreau / Lisa Rodgers7-6, 6-2
W#3 DoublesNorma-Jean Baxter / Ann Lewis vs Denise Eilers / Lauren McCormick6-4, 2-6, 1-0
L#1 DoublesAllyson Brantley / Ann Lewis vs Yan Key / Joy Hice1-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesKaren Baker / Anita Wicklund vs Jacqueline Medeiros / Martha Forlines6-1, 6-1
L#3 DoublesHolly Cannon / Connie Hinton vs Dee Campbell / Kay Cruickshank0-6, 1-6
2025-11-15vs Big Canoe - Sharon PetreyWon 30
W#1 DoublesJacqueline Hughes / Susan Ross vs Barbara Fraser / Karen Davis6-3, 6-3
W#2 DoublesNorma-Jean Baxter / Melanie Stevens vs Diana Mahaney / Teri Koviac6-7, 6-2, 1-0
W#3 DoublesLynn Blanchard / Ann Lewis vs Sharon Petrey / Cindy Tully6-3, 6-3
2025-11-08vs Mountain - Christie TuckerWon 30
W#1 DoublesNancy Wentz / Susan Ross vs Maria D'Alessandro / Denise Eilers6-1, 7-5
W#2 DoublesMelanie Stevens / Lynn Blanchard vs Patty Tynes / Melinda Boudreau2-6, 7-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesAnita Wicklund / Connie Hinton vs Lauren McCormick / Lisa Rodgers6-0, 6-2
2025-11-01vs Gilmer County P&R - Christie TuckerSplit 11
L#1 DoublesAllyson Brantley / Melanie Stevens vs Kay Cruickshank / Nicole Lister4-6, 4-6
W#2 DoublesJacqueline Hughes / Karen Baker vs Dee Campbell / Martha Forlines6-1, 6-0
2025-10-18vs Mountain - Christie TuckerWon 21
W#1 DoublesNancy Wentz / Susan Ross vs Patty Tynes / Denise Eilers6-1, 6-2
L#2 DoublesHolly Cannon / Karen Baker vs Christie Tucker / Terry Cullen3-6, 3-6
W#3 DoublesTamara Pearson / Melanie Stevens vs Darra Schmidt / Lisa Rodgers6-2, 6-1
2025-09-20vs Big Canoe - Sharon PetreyLost 12
W#1 DoublesKaren Baker / Norma-Jean Baxter vs Teri Koviac / Donna Symons7-5, 4-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesSusan Ross / Anita Wicklund vs Mary Lynn Cagle / Antonia Rogers7-6, 4-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesConnie Hinton / Tamara Pearson vs Deena Wilson / Mary Jane Egan4-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Women's 6.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.94 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.38
Anita Wicklund
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.21
Jacqueline Hughes
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
3.06
Susan Ross
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published
3.00
Melanie Stevens
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published
2.99
Norma-Jean Baxter
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
2.90
Allyson Brantley
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
2.88
Tamara Pearson
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.87
Carol Peterson
published 3.5
2.75
Holly Cannon
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
2.38
Connie Hinton
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
Lynn Blanchard
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Anita Wicklund
3W–4L career · type S · 3 lines in 2026
<1%79%20%
3.38
Jacqueline Hughes
12W–5L career · 2 lines in 2026
7%91%2%
3.21
Susan Ross
14W–4L career · 5 lines in 2026
35%65%<1%
3.06
Melanie Stevens
13W–4L career · 5 lines in 2026
>99%<1%<1%
3.00
Norma-Jean Baxter
13W–4L career · 3 lines in 2026
53%47%<1%
2.99
3.5
Allyson Brantley
6W–6L career · 3 lines in 2026
75%25%<1%
2.90
Tamara Pearson
9W–7L career · 2 lines in 2026
79%21%<1%
2.88
3.5
Carol Peterson
8W–6L career · no lines in 2026
83%17%<1%
2.87
Holly Cannon
6W–9L career · 3 lines in 2026
96%4%<1%
2.75
3
Connie Hinton
1W–6L career · type S · 3 lines in 2026
81%19%<1%
2.38
Lynn Blanchard
7W–9L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.