Teams

RACQUETSHIP

2023 Virginia Beach Combo · Virginia Beach Combo 7.5 Men

11 players · average NTRP 4.00 / VIRGINIA

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2023-09-22vs TEAM SOUTHWon 10
W#2 DoublesBrian Sweitzer / Shaun Sabio vs Rodney Malone / Roland Nave7-5, 7-5
2023-09-21vs TEAM SOUTHWon 10
W#1 DoublesDanilo Angeles / Monte Lehmkuhler vs Milton Wiggins / Rodney Malone6-1, 6-2
2023-09-18vs TEAM SOUTHWon 10
W#3 DoublesDanilo Angeles / Monte Lehmkuhler vs A J Suvari / Jay Sarcone6-4, 6-2
2023-09-11Won 10
W#2 DoublesBrian Sweitzer / Shaun Sabio vs Aaron Peckham / Robert Kramer7-5, 6-1
2023-08-21vs TEAM SOUTHLost 01
L#1 DoublesBrian Sweitzer / Adam Long vs Aaron Peckham / Roland Nave7-5, 2-6, 0-1
2023-08-09vs TEAM SOUTHWon 20
W#2 DoublesBrian Sweitzer / Shaun Sabio vs Morgan Ames / Roland Nave6-2, 6-0
W#3 DoublesJustin Pierce / Monte Lehmkuhler vs Steven South / Jay Sarcone6-3, 6-1
2023-08-07vs TEAM SOUTHWon 10
W#3 DoublesJustin Pierce / Monte Lehmkuhler vs Morgan Ames / Jay Sarcone6-1, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Virginia Beach Combo 7.5 Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.74 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.32
Kevin Kopf
published
4.00
Justin Pierce
published
3.90
James Bracey
published 4.5
3.87
Brian Sweitzer
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.85
Josh Pierce
published
Danilo Angeles
published 4
3.71
Shaun Sabio
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.62
Matthew Dey
published
3.47
Tommy VanDaniker
published
3.34
Monte Lehmkuhler
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.32
Renald Castro
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Shaun Sabio + Brian Sweitzer303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Kevin Kopf
7W–5L career · no lines in 2023
1%91%8%
4.32
Justin Pierce
16W–10L career · no lines in 2023
<1%49%51%
4.00
4.5
James Bracey
4W–7L career · no lines in 2023
77%23%<1%
3.90
4
Brian Sweitzer
152W–86L career · 4 lines in 2023
<1%83%16%
3.87
Josh Pierce
8W–1L career · no lines in 2023
<1%88%12%
3.85
4
Danilo Angeles
5W–4L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
4
Shaun Sabio
52W–21L career · 3 lines in 2023
5%93%1%
3.71
Matthew Dey
36W–6L career · no lines in 2023
<1%17%83%
3.62
Tommy VanDaniker
13W–7L career · no lines in 2023
<1%59%41%
3.47
3.5
Monte Lehmkuhler
85W–55L career · 4 lines in 2023
<1%89%10%
3.34
Renald Castro
12W–9L career · no lines in 2023
1%91%8%
3.32

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.