Teams

Northern/Narvaez/65&Over7.0M

2024 ADULT 65 & OVER SUMMER · 7.0 Men

16 players · average NTRP 3.00 / NORTHERN

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
2024-07-07Won 10
W#1 DoublesMichael Streater / John Jerlow vs Mark Hendrickson / Peter Haan6-1
2024-06-23vs HaanWon 10
W#1 DoublesMichael Streater / Mike Hicks vs Mark Hendrickson / Roger Stevens6-1
2024-05-19vs HaanWon 10
W#2 DoublesRichard Iverson / Michael Streater vs Roger Stevens / Lawrence Wong6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 7.0 Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.35 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.73
John Genz
published
3.60
Randall Paulson
published
3.43
Michael Streater
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.30
Michael Trangle
published
3.22
Mike Hicks
published
3.15
Mark Alschlager
published
3.01
Eric Narvaez
published 3
John Goulett
published
John Jerlow
published
Leigh Carlson
published
Patrick Ledray
published
Peter Krause
published
Richard Iverson
published
Rick Hancks
published
Thomas Petersen
published
Timothy Orgeman
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Eric Narvaez + Patrick Ledray044 matchesnot enough data
Patrick Ledray + Michael Trangle224 matchesnot enough data
Michael Trangle + Mike Hicks224 matchesnot enough data
Leigh Carlson + Michael Trangle303 matchesnot enough data
Leigh Carlson + Mike Hicks213 matchesnot enough data
Michael Streater + Mike Hicks213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

John Genz
62W–41L career · no lines in 2024
<1%4%96%
3.73
Randall Paulson
74W–45L career · no lines in 2024
22%78%<1%
3.60
Michael Streater
158W–102L career · 3 lines in 2024
<1%71%29%
3.43
Michael Trangle
21W–15L career · no lines in 2024
1%93%6%
3.30
Mike Hicks
17W–12L career · no lines in 2024
5%94%2%
3.22
Mark Alschlager
16W–23L career · no lines in 2024
13%86%<1%
3.15
3
Eric Narvaez
8W–11L career · no lines in 2024
<1%48%52%
3.01
John Goulett
4W–1L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
John Jerlow
4W–5L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Leigh Carlson
13W–16L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Patrick Ledray
10W–22L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Peter Krause
5W–12L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Richard Iverson
10W–3L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Rick Hancks
10W–4L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Thomas Petersen
3W–4L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Timothy Orgeman
2W–1L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.